Your'e failing to grasp the point made so will leave it therePresumably he will advise someone that he isn’t going to sign a new contract and intends to run his current one down.
If he does City act as I’ve described.
If he’s says nothing to anyone but still hasn’t signed a contract extension by (say) 1Jan 20 refer to above.
City have got to remain in control however un popular the outcome may be to some.
This should always be the case in a business irrespective of the shameful & shameless actions of Munchen.
Only my opinion btw.
A reminder that PSG bought Mbappé 180 M€ or 161 M£ when he was not the superstar he is today. Was not the posterboy of French national team who won the World Cup. Was not the best goalscorer of his club and the league. Was not voted best player of the year. Didn't have the marketing pull he has today and from which his club is benefitting (just recently he became the model of japanese fashion brand Bulk and Bulk became a regional sponsor of PSG as well).Sell him for £120m, buy Mbappe for £180m... £60 net spend on the best young forward in the world. I'd take that any day. Leroy is replacable.
Come on Pudge, that is so obvious.In what way is he more talented?
Must be worth at least 250M, and even at that a bargain, 3 years under Pep and what would he be worth 500m?A reminder that PSG bought Mbappé 180 M€ or 161 M£ when he was not the superstar he is today. Was not the posterboy of French national team who won the World Cup. Was not the best goalscorer of his club and the league. Was not voted best player of the year. Didn't have the marketing pull he has today and from which his club is benefitting (just recently he became the model of japanese fashion brand Bulk and Bulk became a regional sponsor of PSG as well).
I think you are very far from the fee PSG would be asking for Mbappé, should they sell him.
True but it seems Bayern’s the only club he wants, maybe it’s because he’s German, maybe because they’re the only one who can afford him now it’s towards the end of the window. We should have nipped this in the bud and started bidding for Kimmich and others to shut them up.But it's two full seasons, he's worth way more than £90m to buy him out of a contract that long. That figure is more acceptable for a 1 year contract(but as the above poster says, Hazard to Madrid might suggest otherwise even there) with a player as highly rated as Sané with so many years ahead of him.
Also Bayern have very few options out there, even the commentary from their game last night was stating how urgent they are to replace Robben and Ribbery. They can't afford to wait 2years. Most of their other options are off the table. We should be stating what he's worth immediately and that we aren't looking to sell... £120m is quite reasonable in this market I thought. As I said look at the fees Chelsea got for players surplus to requirements in recent years, never mind a player as good as Sané who we want to keep. We are way way behind in this area and it needs to change. It's more about our lack of nous in the way things work, we might not be looking to sell at all but we should be protecting ourselves by making sure if he does go we get the highest fee possible by making the right statements.
The contract we signed him on appears to have been smartly done at least, we just aren't making a point of how strong our position is publicly for some reason.
And how the fuck do you know Munich wouldn't pay £120m, in today's market Leroy is worth more than that.Bayern aren't paying 120m either, but who's counting?