johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
OK then, as long as it makes sense to you, that's what's important in your complaint not the meaning of words obviously. (It is perfectly possible to prove a negative via modus tollens and numerous variations btw. )
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dear Atheists..
- Thread starter Bill Walker
- Start date
Don’t bother, mate, he’s not an adult.The fact of whether a god exists or not.
Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
99.99% of the population used to think the world was flat. Didn't make them any more right though did it?85+% of the world's current population and 99.99% of everybody who has lived since homo sapiens evolved would disagree with you. Not so clear really.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Don't think the existence of God is capable of scientific proof and I don't believe the god of the philosophers exists either. I do though agree with the views expressed so well by the Archbishop of Canterbury in his YT debate a few pages back.The fact of whether a god exists or not.
lol, I thought you'd left the building. Please spare me the playground abuse and behave yourself.Don’t bother, mate, he’s not an adult.
A few still do and insist they are right. Dogmatism rules.99.99% of the population used to think the world was flat. Didn't make them any more right though did it?
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
Yes the argument from consensus has its logical limits but it makes our world go round nevertheless.99.99% of the population used to think the world was flat. Didn't make them any more right though did it?
Fuck off, I wasn’t talking to you.Don't think the existence of God is capable of scientific proof and I don't believe the god of the philosophers exists either. I do though agree with the views expressed so well by the Archbishop of Canterbury in his YT debate a few pages back.
lol, I thought you'd left the building. Please spare me the playground abuse and behave yourself.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
surprised you're not one of them tbh ;-)A few still do and insist they are right. Dogmatism rules.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
True for once but I'm sure I was mentioned.Fuck off, I wasn’t talking to you.
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,342
I'm with you there. But probably not for the same reason.Don't think the existence of God is capable of scientific proof.
On what grounds? Because they actually articulated what the meant by a god, and therefore had something to discuss? You see it's very easy to maintain the possibility of god as long as you do absolutely nothing to define the term whatsoever, because no-one can ever disprove something that doesn't even exist as a coherent concept.I don't believe the god of the philosophers exists either.