Did it bother anyone that we started with NO...

SuperYaya said:
malg said:
Why then did the Rags manage to win so many league with a decent amount of Brtit players? If it's about English players being more expensive then we should pay that money. It's been proven time sand time again that having a smattering of English players in your starting 11 wins you the league.

Rags aren't treated the same. Roy Hodgson complained that Lescott wasn't playing enough, yet made Danny Welbeck a fixture even though they had very similar amounts of play time last season and he's shit.

Lescotts is more or a goal threat than that shite
 
I would love nothing more than a starting XI of English players, most if not all mancunian. The only English players who would make a vast improvement on our best XI are Jack Wilshere and Leyton Baines. You could argue Rooney but would he make a better partner for Aguero than Negredo does?

Richards, Lesscott, Milner and Rodwell all get their chances when fully fit, but they don't exactly strike fear to other European clubs. I would rather have Nastasic, Negredo and Fernandinho then Jones, Welbeck and Cleverly, i think most clubs would.
 
I'd like to see Milner play more; he always looks a threat when he plays, and looks for more capable of beating a man than Navas does. I'd certainly pick him in away games, you just get more out of him in those type of fixtures than you do from Nasri.

As for the rest of our English contingent, it doesn't really bother me. Yes, it would be nice to have more English players, but there's no room for sentiment. I suppose I'm slightly concerned that Lescott seems to have been frozen out a little; I think we could have done with him at times. But as for the others, Richards will get more games if he stays fit and Rodwell...well, sadly I think he's destined for an early retirement.
 
And the general responses to the question asked by the OP is exactly why English football is where it is currently...
And to think just over 2 seasons ago we won the league with 4 or 5 English players regularly turning out for us.
It would be truly great if we had English players coming through our system and hopefully in the future they will.

The Premier League has fucked English / British football to the point almost of no return.
If you are happy with that then fine. However, I'm not.
 
Vince, Zaba,Yaya, Merlin ,Kun , Alf etc- their language is football and their nationality is Manchester City.
 
mancitymick said:
One of the main problems is the fee commanded for English players. Milner cost more than both Silva and YaYa (Obviously taking away wages)
2010

James Milner (Aston Villa): £26m

Yaya Toure (Barcelona): £24m

David Silva (Valencia): £24m

Figures taken from MuEN

Also Negredo cost half of what Liverpool paid for Andy Carroll

Milner was 16m plus Stephen Ireland wasn't he? So in hindsight he cost 16m
 
I would be tempted to give a flying fuck if arsenil hadn't first done it almost a decade ago now
in fact they had no brits in their entire squad when they blazed this particular trail so many years ago


yawn.....
 
Ultimately its a point in the direction of the FA. Your players aren't good enough to get in to the top teams. I know they say they're working on it, but what exactly is it that they have planned to make a team win a league with 11 Englishmen? Its about time Englishmen fought English wars anyway.
 
TGR said:
And the general responses to the question asked by the OP is exactly why English football is where it is currently...
And to think just over 2 seasons ago we won the league with 4 or 5 English players regularly turning out for us.
It would be truly great if we had English players coming through our system and hopefully in the future they will.

The Premier League has fucked English / British football to the point almost of no return.
If you are happy with that then fine. However, I'm not.

About 20 years ago the Spanish national side was a laughing stock. How can it be, the world's media anguished, that a country which boasts in its league some of the greatest players in the game produces such a mediocre national side? And yet, over time, as the players who were good enough to do well alongside the galacticos came through, Spain started to develop, and became European champions and World cup winners.

The reality is that English players at the moment are not on a level with players we produced 20-25 years ago. We don't (yet) have a keeper as good as shilton, we don't have a defender as good as butcher, we don't have a playmaker as good as gascoigne, we don't have wide players as good as barnes and waddle and we don't have a striker as good as lineker. what we do have is one of the strongest leagues in the world, and it is not hugely surprising that some less than world class players are struggling to command regular places in the starting XIs of the best teams.

FWIW my view is that the future is a fair bit rosier than the present. We have a handful of bright prospects - Hart will be the best goalkeeper in the world in 5 years time unless before then he self combusts or the media hack him to pieces. Baines is a huge talent. Wilshere, Rodwell, Sturridge etc. With a few more years of playing at a very high level in the premier league and champions league we could have a very good group of players, just as Spain do now.

for the time being, i will watch the best City team I can remember seeing, and will continue to enjoy every minute of it.

it isn't City's fault that England doesn't have that many players who are truly good enough to win the English league
 
Hansen whingeing in the Daily Telegraph that City have caused Roy Hodgson a problem by dropping Joe Hart. Well tough titty Al. City's primary responsibility is to themselves these days not Roy Hodgson.

And let's be honest, England have generally underachieved for over 40 years now so I don't buy the argument that foreign imports are killing the domestic game. The only times we've done anything are on home soil, in the World Cup and Euros, and Italia 90. In that latter tournament the general standard was pretty poor and we only just managed to beat Egypt in the group then toiled to extra time wins against Belgium and Cameroon in the knockout stages.

The answer is for the FA to completely overhaul the coaching system for young players and train far more coaches. But the problem is that the FA is still largely comprised of the heirs of people like Peter Swales, so will never achieve anything radical or innovative.
 
TGR said:
And the general responses to the question asked by the OP is exactly why English football is where it is currently...
And to think just over 2 seasons ago we won the league with 4 or 5 English players regularly turning out for us.
It would be truly great if we had English players coming through our system and hopefully in the future they will.

The Premier League has fucked English / British football to the point almost of no return.
If you are happy with that then fine. However, I'm not.

Strange view considering you've spent the last few weeks slagging Hart off and telling us all how shit he is.
 
It does bother me a bit TBH. Hope this will improve soon when we have the academy working to its full potential.
 
Couldn't care less.

If I could I would have all of our players not playing international games and instead of spending time flying to Brazil for a friendly for example and instead have them back at home resting for the next City game.

That's not to say I don't want Hart, Richards, Rodwell, Lescott and so on playing its just that if they play they play and if they don't they don't.

The premier league has not killed the national team. The FA has.

When you can pick up players across Europe and S.America that are light years ahead of the ones that are coming through the academies and "centre of excellence" across England at a fraction of the cost then why would/should any club buy British players?
You get the exceptions to this but there aren't many and the ones that are start for the top teams anyway because they are better than the other players in their position at the club.
 
mansour's tow ropes said:
mancitymick said:
One of the main problems is the fee commanded for English players. Milner cost more than both Silva and YaYa (Obviously taking away wages)
2010

James Milner (Aston Villa): £26m

Yaya Toure (Barcelona): £24m

David Silva (Valencia): £24m

Figures taken from MuEN

Also Negredo cost half of what Liverpool paid for Andy Carroll

Milner was 16m plus Stephen Ireland wasn't he? So in hindsight he cost 16m

Are you THFC6061 :)
 
You play your best team and at the moment there are no English players. When our academy is in full operation this will no doubt change. I have no problem with it .
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top