You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dipper Takeover? [Merged]
- Thread starter bluemonkey71
- Start date
fbloke said:H and G are actively trying to control the agenda but in simple terms anyone they sell to has be be ok'd by broughton and the creditors as well.
It could get to court before a sale is agreed.
How many deals have ever ended in court? Virtually none. The creditors generally won't have any say and if a buyer chooses to pay off the banks, no consent will be required. Broughton won't be in a difficult position either because ultimately Liverpool will be fortunate to have one real bid never mind a competitive situation
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Sky News said Liverpool were going to be taken over by a Syrian dude by sunday...
TheLegendOfBerti said:Sky News said Liverpool were going to be taken over by a Syrian dude by sunday...
And my arse is a cream cake.......<br /><br />-- Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:32 pm --<br /><br />
projectriver said:fbloke said:H and G are actively trying to control the agenda but in simple terms anyone they sell to has be be ok'd by broughton and the creditors as well.
It could get to court before a sale is agreed.
How many deals have ever ended in court? Virtually none. The creditors generally won't have any say and if a buyer chooses to pay off the banks, no consent will be required. Broughton won't be in a difficult position either because ultimately Liverpool will be fortunate to have one real bid never mind a competitive situation
This one might as i see a scenario where the banks are not paid back in full, at least not immediately.
If and its a IF, a buyer form H and G's side is willing to pay off the banks in full AND pay off H and G i would suggest that the buyer represents no other than H and G.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
There's already a rumour that this Syrian is actually fronting for Gillett.fbloke said:If and its a IF, a buyer form H and G's side is willing to pay off the banks in full AND pay off H and G i would suggest that the buyer represents no other than H and G.
bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,082
fbloke said:TheLegendOfBerti said:Sky News said Liverpool were going to be taken over by a Syrian dude by sunday...
And my arse is a cream cake.......
-- Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:32 pm --
projectriver said:How many deals have ever ended in court? Virtually none. The creditors generally won't have any say and if a buyer chooses to pay off the banks, no consent will be required. Broughton won't be in a difficult position either because ultimately Liverpool will be fortunate to have one real bid never mind a competitive situation
This one might as i see a scenario where the banks are not paid back in full, at least not immediately.
If and its a IF, a buyer form H and G's side is willing to pay off the banks in full AND pay off H and G i would suggest that the buyer represents no other than H and G.
thanks for that picture! Not! pmsl
bluemanc
Well-Known Member
chris or keith harris (whoever that is)said on talksport he's fronting a bid that has been ongoing for the last 6 months & all the other bids are a load of bollocks.
persvenality cult
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,855
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/7939708/Liverpool-postpone-meeting-to-discuss-takeover-with-no-serious-bids-on-the-table.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... table.html</a>
Liverpool postpone meeting to discuss takeover with no serious bids on the table
A Liverpool board meeting scheduled for Thursday to discuss offers for the club has been postponed, providing further evidence of the complications and uncertainty surrounding the club’s future.
By Paul Kelso, Chief Sports Reporter
Published: 7:36PM BST 11 Aug 2010
Telegraph Sport can disclose that the decision to postpone was taken amid continuing doubts about the credibility of potential bidders and after the date had been publicised in the media.
A well-placed source said it would have been “premature” to meet this week, indicating that the club were yet to receive any formal offers backed by proof of funds.
Sources said the board would not meet this week and it is unclear when the five-man group – chairman Martin Broughton, owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett, managing director Christian Purslow and commercial director Ian Ayre – will now convene.
The delay raises doubts about the club’s prospects of changing hands this month, or even before the Oct 6 refinancing deadline set by Royal Bank of Scotland.
Broughton had asked as many as six potential buyers to table detailed offers, including proof of funds, by the end of this week, in the hope that two might be worth serious consideration. That deadline now looks ambitious.
For supporters desperate for clarity amid the claims and counter-claims of the last fortnight the postponement is not a positive sign.
Broughton might still emerge from the fog of speculation clutching a piece of paper securing the future of Liverpool FC in the near future, but this does not make it feel any more imminent.
At least five potential buyers are thought to have expressed an interest. Chinese-American businessman Kenneth Huang and Syrian Yahya Kurdi have both said they are considering an offer for the club, while the Kuwaiti Al-Kharafi family and New York investors the Rhone Group are also thought to have expressed an interest. Indian conglomerate Sahara said this week it would not bid “for the time being”, but did not rule it out.
Until any of them table offers with proof of funds Broughton’s hopes of securing a deal before the end of the transfer window will be dashed.
The timing is significant. The deadline for formal offers falls on Friday, and marks the end of the two-week window after which Huang indicated he would walk away if his offer was not accepted. It is also a fortnight from the closure of the transfer window, the last opportunity for Roy Hodgson to enhance his squad.
It appears likely now that the window will close without a formal change in Liverpool’s ownership leaving the far more significant deadline set by RBS looking like the decisive factor in the fate of the club.
The bank agreed to extend its £237million loan facility in April only after Hicks and Gillett agreed to sell and to appoint Broughton to oversee the process.
RBS is also understood to have imposed more expensive terms on the Americans, with £110million of their debt reportedly converted to payment-in-kind loans accruing interest of up to £2.5m a week.
This gives RBS by far the greatest leverage of any of the players in the Anfield saga, though whether they will choose to use it remains to be seen.
They are reported to have offered to “ease” the financing for any bidder, a move that emphasises the sensitivity of their position.
If October arrives with no acceptable offer RBS could extend its financing to the Americans again, or take a more drastic step and force out Hicks and Gillett and effectively take control of the club.
That would be a hugely controversial step for the publicly-owned bank to take and would require the endorsement of senior management including chief executive Stephen Hester. Removing the Americans might be popular on Merseyside and would certainly simplify the process, but it would not be without implications for the banks reputation.
For potential bidders RBS’s situation offers an opportunity. Letting the clock tick down will increase the bank’s anxiety, the fees paid by Hicks and Gillett and drive the price down .
Sahara’s statement this week suggests that may be their strategy. Yahya Kurdi, understood to be backed by investors from Sharjah and considered a serious bidder by the Americans, who are seeking a profit from their time in charge at Anfield, indicated he would do likewise.
“I want at least two months, two months to see everything. After that if everything is OK it’s a deal. If not, ‘Thank you very much,’” he told Bloomberg this week.
The Huang bid told Telegraph Sport on Wednesday that it had still not decided whether to make an offer. Marc Ganis, a US associate of Huang’s, said via email:
“We haven’t yet decided to submit a formal proposal but are interested in looking at an investment there. I suspect that is obvious. We also have not identified the potential investors.”
Ganis’s statement is a far more sober assessment than the suggestions of a swift Chinese government-led takeover emanating from Huang’s camp last week Huang, a sports business investor who cites top-level contacts in China and the US, has made no comment himself since news of his intentions emerged last week, there has been confusion over the source of his funding and the exact make-up of his team.
His background has come under scrutiny too, though not via his company website, which has displayed the message ‘Site Under Maintenance’ since his involvement Huang received high-profile endorsement on Wednesday when Randy Levine, president of the New York Yankees, telling The New York Times he had arranged marketing tie-ups in China.
Huang would hope to do the same for Liverpool, but first, like everyone else circling the club, he will have to convince Broughton he has the finances to buy the club.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
So does that mean my offer of £25 and a complete set of Warplane magazine and the works of Charles Dickens isn't being taken seriously?