George Hannah
Well-Known Member
He's tired and he's off to Chile in a couple of months - give him a break.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Discussion: Manuel Pellegrini 2015/16
- Thread starter Danamy
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Keepingthefaithsince1976
Well-Known Member
City win in spite of the manager...he made a mistake in an interview...zzzzzzz. Carry on Manuel. All good so far. 3-0 win away from home despite loads of injuries. Crikey....How will we cope?
itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,331
Not if we play 442
Who exactly would start then?
Sunnysideupp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 332
If we play 442 then Aguero kelechi sterling Navas should be the attackers.. Not saying that 442 is our best formation but it could work against some oppositions just like it did todayWho exactly would start then?
itisrising
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,331
If we play 442 then Aguero kelechi sterling Navas should be the attackers.. Not saying that 442 is our best formation but it could work against some oppositions just like it did today
Yeah but the issue is we'd only have 2 CM options. A big name would have to be dropped.
Sunnysideupp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 332
I'm pretty sure Pellers will revert to the same predictable formation we have been using all season.. Yaya and ferna in midfield, sterling, silva and kbd as attackig mids and Aguero as striker.. Substitute Navas in the 60th min.. Demichelles/ Fernando in the 80th minute and kelechi in the 88th minute.. Rinse repeat in the next gameYeah but the issue is we'd only have 2 CM options. A big name would have to be dropped.
City Raider
Well-Known Member
I just don't understand how he has gone from refusing to play anything other than 4-4-2 to pretty much never playing it any more.
Our best football under him was 4-4-2 when we were just blitzing teams off the park. We were only asking for a change in CL where possession is key. It took him ages to alter it and now it's all he wants to play!
4-4-2 is enough to better most prem teams, why is it all or nothing? Where's the flexibility to suit the match we need to play? Pretty baffling.
Our best football under him was 4-4-2 when we were just blitzing teams off the park. We were only asking for a change in CL where possession is key. It took him ages to alter it and now it's all he wants to play!
4-4-2 is enough to better most prem teams, why is it all or nothing? Where's the flexibility to suit the match we need to play? Pretty baffling.
Sunnysideupp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 332
Pellers picks a formation and sticks to it regardless of the opposition or form.. Last season he overdid the 442 and made us predictable, this season he is overusing 4231 and making us predictableI just don't understand how he has gone from refusing to play anything other than 4-4-2 to pretty much never playing it any more.
Our best football under him was 4-4-2 when we were just blitzing teams off the park. We were only asking for a change in CL where possession is key. It took him ages to alter it and now it's all he wants to play!
4-4-2 is enough to better most prem teams, why is it all or nothing? Where's the flexibility to suit the match we need to play? Pretty baffling.
forevermancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Jan 2005
- Messages
- 5,987
An away win was needed and he delivered! Well done pellers!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.