Discussion: Manuel Pellegrini 2015/16

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guardiola, possibly but not for sure.
Klopp, on a par with.
Everyone else, including Mancini, not on Pellers level. (And I still love Mancini, always have, always will, but he's not the manager Pellers is and never would be)

You really think only Pep is better, f@ck me put down the crack pipe. Funny when Pelle left Real there wasn't a queue of top clubs after him.......
 
He made some mistakes today no doubt about. Worse than that, he didn't react to what was happening. I understand lining up cautiously with Villa having a new manager to impress, but I disagree strongly with him dropping Navas after his display on Tuesday. He was exceptional and he certainly didn't play like he needed a rest when he actually came on. In fact he created our two best chances which I still can't believe we missed. You could probably argue that the same 11 should have all started today.

After the break it was obvious that Villa were content with a draw. They offered almost zero counter attacking threat. With that in mind, why take off the only attacking player (maybe with the exception of KDB) left who actually has a cutting edge (Yaya) to bring on a more defensive player. Furthermore, the Villa crowd were silent up until that point. Introducing Delph woke them up and they got behind their team for the last 15.

Finally, only bringing Kelechi on with 7 minutes remaining is utterly mind boggling. I'm sorry but it's actually beyond a joke that we lined up chance after chance and promising situation after promising situation but still decided to leave our only natural striker on the bench. In those 7 minutes he still managed to put one on a plate for Fernando. The more obvious choice was Kelechi for Fernando. Anyone can see that surely?

On Tuesday, Pellers took a lot of praise for how we played and he did deserve it, however he only did what every pundit and every City fan has been crying out for him to do in Europe for the past 2 years (play with a midfield 3). It just worries me that it seems to take him a while to catch on. He doesn't react quickly enough to situations and he makes a rod for his own back all too often. Dropping Hart against Spurs for example (If Willy has a blinder, he has to play the week after, if he has a howler, Pellers takes the stick). It cost us 3 points that day, and I think how he set up today cost us another 2.

Too add balance, regardless of how we set up we still created 3 absolute sitters today and should have won easily. I've no idea how Sterling missed from less than 6 yards out, and I've no idea what De Bruyne was attempting. But the 3 points would have only papered over the cracks that have been there all season. We only turn up for segments of the game and that has been the case for as long as I can remember, even under Mancini. Maybe that will never change while we have certain players in our side. Neither will our lack of a cutting edge. I don't think I've come across a team who miss sitters as routinely as we do.

Despite all of that, I still fancy us for the league. Not because of Pellers and not in spite of him either. Overall he's a good manager and he's done very well, but in truth, he isn't top, top class. We all know that, so at times he will struggle to extract the maximum from us - and that's what happened today.
 
Guardiola, possibly but not for sure.
Klopp, on a par with.
Everyone else, including Mancini, not on Pellers level. (And I still love Mancini, always have, always will, but he's not the manager Pellers is and never would be)

I have heard it all now !!
 
Didn't realise we'd only picked up 2 points from the last 3 away games. Bad habits from last season coming back!
 
but top of the league,league cup and champs league isn't a pro pelle,im not fucking pro pelle im pro city,some people though for whatever reason are anti pelle and I don't know why.

You mentioned still being in the fa cup as a plus not me, some people don't rate him that highly, the reasons are pretty sound and even for those who disagree they are certainly worth discussion, the problem is those calling him a **** or those unwilling to accept his shortfalls

Calling posters arrogant,dim or spoilt are arguments of the defeated imho and are used by some to deflect

The vast majority on here Are pro city which is why feelings run so strong
 
He made some mistakes today no doubt about. Worse than that, he didn't react to what was happening. I understand lining up cautiously with Villa having a new manager to impress, but I disagree strongly with him dropping Navas after his display on Tuesday. He was exceptional and he certainly didn't play like he needed a rest when he actually came on. In fact he created our two best chances which I still can't believe we missed. You could probably argue that the same 11 should have all started today.

After the break it was obvious that Villa were content with a draw. They offered almost zero counter attacking threat. With that in mind, why take off the only attacking player (maybe with the exception of KDB) left who actually has a cutting edge (Yaya) to bring on a more defensive player. Furthermore, the Villa crowd were silent up until that point. Introducing Delph woke them up and they got behind their team for the last 15.

Finally, only bringing Kelechi on with 7 minutes remaining is utterly mind boggling. I'm sorry but it's actually beyond a joke that we lined up chance after chance and promising situation after promising situation but still decided to leave our only natural striker on the bench. In those 7 minutes he still managed to put one on a plate for Fernando. The more obvious choice was Kelechi for Fernando. Anyone can see that surely?

On Tuesday, Pellers took a lot of praise for how we played and he did deserve it, however he only did what every pundit and every City fan has been crying out for him to do in Europe for the past 2 years (play with a midfield 3). It just worries me that it seems to take him a while to catch on. He doesn't react quickly enough to situations and he makes a rod for his own back all too often. Dropping Hart against Spurs for example (If Willy has a blinder, he has to play the week after, if he has a howler, Pellers takes the stick). It cost us 3 points that day, and I think how he set up today cost us another 2.

Too add balance, regardless of how we set up we still created 3 absolute sitters today and should have won easily. I've no idea how Sterling missed from less than 6 yards out, and I've no idea what De Bruyne was attempting. But the 3 points would have only papered over the cracks that have been there all season. We only turn up for segments of the game and that has been the case for as long as I can remember, even under Mancini. Maybe that will never change while we have certain players in our side. Neither will our lack of a cutting edge. I don't think I've come across a team who miss sitters as routinely as we do.

Despite all of that, I still fancy us for the league. Not because of Pellers and not in spite of him either. Overall he's a good manager and he's done very well, but in truth, he isn't top, top class. We all know that, so at times he will struggle to extract the maximum from us - and that's what happened today.
A fair and well balanced post
 
"Without Bony and without Sergio Aguero we don't have a player who plays inside the box. We have to try and work without them."

Nice quote from Pelle, great pick-up for Kelechi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.