I understand why he gets criticized after losses and not wins, but fail to see why it is stupid to hold him accountable when players he signed for high fees utterly fail to improve us as a team. For clarity, it is too early to judge signings from the past window, but it seems as though you think he is immune to any criticism whatsoever. Please enlighten the uneducated masses what his job is, because it seems player recruitment should be at the forefront. And if the manager is incapable of integrating such inspired signings, why does he still have a job?
As to your final point, which was impressively stated, the poster who I initially quoted cited 2 league titles as evidence for Txiki's effectiveness. In response, I said that Fern was the only player signed by Txiki who was influential in either of the aforementioned titles, so affording him credit was a bit daft. I admit I may have shortchanged Navas a bit, but your responses have been a bit nonsensical. Tending this site has undoubtedly been quite difficult over the last 12 hours, but repeatedly insisting that the masses are too daft to understand the DOF's job seems like an odd place to take a stand.
If Txiki can't get the appointments right he will go the same way as others that fail to live up to expectations go.
He might get longer than the manager but at least in part and significantly I must say the success of the manager and the first team is paramount to his tenure.
He deserves to be scrutinised if the side is under performing as it has been for much of this season.