sir baconface
Well-Known Member
I don’t necessarily correlate negative stuff about team selection and so on with negativity in general.I see negativity (as a mentality) as a form of insecurity. Being positive means being able to put your outlooks out there and risk the "disappointment" of being wrong and having egg on your face. With negativity, you set the bar low so that if you can never be let down so to say.
It happens a tonne on here, and it's the uglier side of Bluemoon. There's plenty of positives; most specifically the excellent humour and insightful discussion, as well as the loopy Off-Topic threads.
But with the actual football, it can be depressing. There's so much negativity. It's ridiculous. I've highlighted the Burnley pre match thread lately, which was sad. A bunch of posters decrying the team to face Burnley because Mahrez and Mendy were playing, acting like we were in legitimate danger of losing.
But it's a general trend. How many times is a team announced and we have 15 pages of complaining about the 1 player in or out of the team that they aren't happy with, as opposed to the 10 others that they are happy with? How many times to people on this forum write us off? Plenty of prematch threads explain how we will lose. Plenty of posters were saying how we were done for and how Pep should go only 1 month ago. At one point earlier this season people were suggesting De Bruyne was done. How many people had written off Stones? Written off Gundogan? Written off Zinchenko? There's a bunch of posters that want Sterling gone and they vocalise it at every opportunity. There are a handful of posters that go out of there way to declare Jesus and Rodri unsuitable for the future of the club on a frequent basis.
That's why it annoys me when people apologise for getting it wrong about Stones or Gundogan. Because I'm 100% sure that the majority of them didn't learn from it and continue their negativity towards someone else.
It doesn't have to be that way either. Posters on this forum are smart and if they took a moment to actually think about things, and see the upside, they'd have so much positive and thoughtful contributions. They need to understand that there's nothing to be afraid of and it's ok to be optimistic. Sure, there are letdowns involved, but in my opinion it's better to be happy and occasionally be disappointed than to live in misery and occasionally be happily surprised. Everyone can be better if they want to be.
As said by another poster, positivity doesn‘t mean thinking everything in the garden is always rosy. Nor does it mean never being critical. It’s perfectly possible to have a generally positive attitude to life while still thinking selection or tactics are wrong. One’s a long term condition; the other may be temporary and contextual.
Last edited: