Alright, I'll bite.
Who determines then what a reasonable argument is ? Is it the person with the alternate viewpoint.
I saw little evidence of reasonable debate just folk getting themselves flustered followed by page after page of anger.
A reasoned debate can be had when someone brings more to the table than "He says things as they are", when he clearly doesn't, or "I like him".
Posting actual Trump tweets or reporting on things that Donald said or did isn't anger, although it may elicit that very feeling. It is neither a witch hunt or "fake news" but apparently that doesn't stop Donald or his flock from labelling any criticism as such.
He has a brilliant business mind of that there can be no denial and a leadership quality that places him ripe for the job to hand.
If by brilliant business mind you mean a serial shafter of his business associates, then yeah sure, I guess.
He's only managed to file for bankruptcy 6 times, 3 of which were for his casino's. And here I was thinking that the house always wins, just not when Donald is around, apparently.
Suffice to say that there are far more brilliant business minds about than Donald.
As for his leadership qualities, they are practically non-existent, as evidenced by the chaos currently enveloping the White House (constant change in personnel) or by his inability to pass any of the bills that he so desperately wants/needs. That's some real leadership right there, especially when you consider that the GOP have the majority in both the senate and the house of representatives..
The political pleasantries will come as time progreses but no more will americans live in fear with this man at the helm.
In essense he will take the good fight to those who will cause harm distress or angst and for that I salute him.
So a looming nuclear war with North-Korea, which Trump seems to find an acceptable possibility, is somehow supposed to make anyone feel safer? Or antagonising Iran instead of making/honouring a deal is somehow a good fight?
If anything he's adding to the fear by pitting Americans against each other.
He understands overnwelmingly the damage free trade has caused to his nation and will put america first.
I'm sure he does, I'm guessing that's why his MAGA gear is being sold by a Canadian company, or why the apparel line of both him and his daughter are being produced in China.
It's fair to say that free trade has caused some unintended damage around the globe but the suggested protectionist measures aren't the answer to those problems and being a hypocrite definitely isn't.
For the time being unless I decide otherwise which I may or may not do god speed mr president.
I have seen little example of excellent debate over the last few months.Just a lets bash the daft Donald thread.
I would say it was the lurkers who were looking in that were left scratching there heads in total bewilderment : /
Coincidentally, I've failed to see any of his supporters being able to come up with a decent argument for their unwavering support. We just need to give the man a chane, we just need to wait. All the while Trump proves, on a daily basis, that he is not presidential in any way, shape or form. You'd have to be seriously uninformed not to notice that, or you simply don't care.
I understand little of the murky world of college votes but I do know he was elected by the populace to serve his nation.
The electorate knew what he was about and voted accordingly on the informantion to hand.
We would only know if they voted against their best interests if another vote was cast and that would be non democratic.
The system is not perfect but democracy should never ever be stifled just because it does not fit your own pernsonal agenda.
It's the same mate with brexit.No one gets the bigger picture.We voted to leave so leave we must.
It's embarrasing watching the huff puff and blow mentality of the brexit losers./
Electoral college votes aren't exactly democratic. Donald lost the popular vote, so ironically, democracy was in effect stifled.
As for Brexit, I'm not British so I don't really care that you seem adamant on giving up on one of the best possible deals, namely the one that you already have with the EU.
I would say that, given the narrow margin with which the referendum was won and your immense respect for democracy, one would expect that you'd have more consideration for the objections of those "brexit losers", especially when you consider that this narrow margin was won on the back of a campaign that was rife with misinformation and "untruths'.
But it's your foot and you're free to shoot it.
Also, Mr.Web seems to think of himself as quite a big boy, so he can defend himself.