Donald Trump

[AliBobbyJ]

Who decides if you are a really nasty, dangerous person?

At the extremes:
Robespierre.
Lenin
Adolf.
Mao.
Pol Pot.
(Dictators of both Left and Right.)

In the USA today there are definitely those in the MAGA movement who are making their own lists of people to be purged in anticipation of a Trump victory and probably some on the far left who'd do the same if they got the chance. Of the two it's the former prospect that's more likely to succeed.

 

[moomba]

She has stated a load of policy positions on the economy, on fiscal policy, on groups she will give a leg up to, on abortion and reproductive rights, on NATO. Did you not notice?

If people start looking for policy how on earth will they criticise her for being a policy vacuum?

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Is she though?
That's the problem for me, i have no idea whatsoever what she will do to 'turn the page'.

If your best feature is not being Donald Trump then its a very low bar.
You have to convince people to vote for you, not just tell them how bad the other guy is.

Its a sad reflection on how bad politics is over there

You have no idea, I am guessing, because you don't read very much. It's all out there in the public domain -- just takes a little elbow grease and some time.

But as you couldn't care less if Trump wins or not, why the fuck would anyone expect you to put any time into any political questions?

Oh . . . except to come here and spout some bullshit. You have time for that, natch.

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

You have no idea, I am guessing, because you don't read very much. It's all out there in the public domain -- just takes a little elbow grease and some time.

But as you couldn't care less if Trump wins or not, why the fuck would anyone expect you to put any time into any political questions?

Oh . . . except to come here and spout some bullshit. You have time for that, natch.

Anyone who thinks some sort of detailed analysis of both candidates is required clearly can't see the blindingly obvious issues with Trump that disqualify him as a candidate.

It says as much about the person. To not see a racist, misogynist, conman grifter. He's also a dirty old perv, a confirmed rapist and most likely a pedo.

Zero analysis is required. Harris is a good person and capable of the job. Trump is not a good person.

 

[The blue phantom]

Just missing the daily reminder that young voters will now boycott voting the dems due to Israel.

I've only posted that 3 times in 4 months. I also stand by it :).....Hey I've always stated the Democrat’s are Monsters for their complicity in genocide, But Trump will be an even bigger Monster. So let's hope the lesser of the Cunts win. A horrible scenario to choose from but Trump will do more damage world wide than the Dems.

 

[The blue phantom]

You should consider who is putting large bets on the orange liar.

This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.

As has already been discussed . . . I suspect the thinking of those red-siders (I'd bet who are also large donors and cultists) is if it pays off, great; if not, the short odds can be used to bolster the case that the election was "stolen". Seems pretty obvious the market's being gamed in a way polls can't be -- especially when Trump doesn't hold the Presidential reins to protest the outcome.

I 100% guarantee if Trump loses, he'll bring up "the odds" as clear "evidence" that the election was "fixed."

 

[MillionMilesAway]

The latest from a family who record mocking songs.

 

[Palerider]

This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.

Yes. Just having a look on Betfair and Trump is 60% ish Harris 40% ish. The markets used to be rock solid reliable but they got Brexit totally wrong and also got the first Trump win totally wrong. So this is neck and neck. J D Vance is 330 to 1 presumably as Trump, if he wins, may die (or be killed) between the election and the swearing in. If it's really close we could be having recounts for the next year.

 

[The blue phantom]

As has already been discussed . . . I suspect the thinking of those red-siders (I'd bet who are also large donors and cultists) is if it pays off, great; if not, the short odds can be used to bolster the case that the election was "stolen". Seems pretty obvious the market's being gamed in a way polls can't be -- especially when Trump doesn't hold the Presidential reins to protest the outcome.

I 100% guarantee if Trump loses, he'll bring up "the odds" as clear "evidence" that the election was "fixed."

Well he should be stating Hillary won going by that Logic :)