At the extremes:Who decides if you are a really nasty, dangerous person?
If people start looking for policy how on earth will they criticise her for being a policy vacuum?She has stated a load of policy positions on the economy, on fiscal policy, on groups she will give a leg up to, on abortion and reproductive rights, on NATO. Did you not notice?
You have no idea, I am guessing, because you don't read very much. It's all out there in the public domain -- just takes a little elbow grease and some time.Is she though?
That's the problem for me, i have no idea whatsoever what she will do to 'turn the page'.
If your best feature is not being Donald Trump then its a very low bar.
You have to convince people to vote for you, not just tell them how bad the other guy is.
Its a sad reflection on how bad politics is over there
Anyone who thinks some sort of detailed analysis of both candidates is required clearly can't see the blindingly obvious issues with Trump that disqualify him as a candidate.You have no idea, I am guessing, because you don't read very much. It's all out there in the public domain -- just takes a little elbow grease and some time.
But as you couldn't care less if Trump wins or not, why the fuck would anyone expect you to put any time into any political questions?
Oh . . . except to come here and spout some bullshit. You have time for that, natch.
I've only posted that 3 times in 4 months. I also stand by it :).....Hey I've always stated the Democrat’s are Monsters for their complicity in genocide, But Trump will be an even bigger Monster. So let's hope the lesser of the Cunts win. A horrible scenario to choose from but Trump will do more damage world wide than the Dems.Just missing the daily reminder that young voters will now boycott voting the dems due to Israel.
This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.You should consider who is putting large bets on the orange liar.
As has already been discussed . . . I suspect the thinking of those red-siders (I'd bet who are also large donors and cultists) is if it pays off, great; if not, the short odds can be used to bolster the case that the election was "stolen". Seems pretty obvious the market's being gamed in a way polls can't be -- especially when Trump doesn't hold the Presidential reins to protest the outcome.This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.
Yes. Just having a look on Betfair and Trump is 60% ish Harris 40% ish. The markets used to be rock solid reliable but they got Brexit totally wrong and also got the first Trump win totally wrong. So this is neck and neck. J D Vance is 330 to 1 presumably as Trump, if he wins, may die (or be killed) between the election and the swearing in. If it's really close we could be having recounts for the next year.This is a £120 Million market on just One of the exchanges.
As has already been discussed . . . I suspect the thinking of those red-siders (I'd bet who are also large donors and cultists) is if it pays off, great; if not, the short odds can be used to bolster the case that the election was "stolen". Seems pretty obvious the market's being gamed in a way polls can't be -- especially when Trump doesn't hold the Presidential reins to protest the outcome.
I 100% guarantee if Trump loses, he'll bring up "the odds" as clear "evidence" that the election was "fixed."