bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
His supporters and the truth are not in the same location though
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
He didnt even blink, he couldnt give a fuck. The narrative being set, such that the journo is asking him about it, is all he cares about. They are just fanning flames. He is best ignored
They are all doing fact checks now. The law says those who publish someone else’s lie are liable for defamation.Amazing. And all it took was a three quarters of a billion dollars defamation lawsuit.
SkyBlueFlux
Well-Known Member
They are all doing fact checks now. The law says those who publish someone else’s lie are liable for defamation.
Which is absolutely correct. If you provide the platform for brazen lies, then you should wear the consequences of said lies.
The exception to this seems to be platforms with user-generated content - YouTube, Twitter, Facebook - as it's incredibly difficult to police. Which is why people can get away with saying practically anything on there. I honestly don't know what you do about these, obviously there are some attempts to counter this (YouTube puts info boxes under some videos, Twitter has community notes), but I'm not sure how effective they are.
Yep, and the posters themselves will generally not be worth suing. Some form of regulation around the level of self policing seems to be the only answer, but incredibly difficult.Which is absolutely correct. If you provide the platform for brazen lies, then you should wear the consequences of said lies.
The exception to this seems to be platforms with user-generated content - YouTube, Twitter, Facebook - as it's incredibly difficult to police. Which is why people can get away with saying practically anything on there. I honestly don't know what you do about these, obviously there are some attempts to counter this (YouTube puts info boxes under some videos, Twitter has community notes), but I'm not sure how effective they are.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Going for harry and meghan again , he is such a vile **** , every word out of his fucking mouth makes me want to punch his lights out
I don’t support the Monarchy but my objection is constitutional, not personal. so ad hominem attacks are not cricket. I quite like Meghan and think she attracts an unfair level of opprobrium.Going for harry and meghan again , he is such a vile **** , every word out of his fucking mouth makes me want to punch his lights out
kaz7
Well-Known Member
He is just another of the white old men who love to slag off a black heritage woman , these men are obsessed with her . Also harry is an easy target as he is british and trump hates us as wellI don’t support the Monarchy but my objection is constitutional, not personal. so ad hominem attacks are not cricket.
I posted earlier that Letitia James, a brilliant and powerful black woman, was the stuff of nightmares for these loonies.He is just another of the white old men who love to slag off a black heritage woman , these men are obsessed with her . Also harry is an easy target as he is british and trump hates us as well
super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 47,017
It's completely destroying societySocial media is doing this to people. It’s hypnotising them into losing their power of objective thought and critical thinking.