Donald Trump

During cross, Cohen seems to have been caught in a lie about the topic of a phone call he had. Cohen claims the call was about the Stormy Daniels payoff; however - text messages immediately preceding the call indicate that the topic was much more likely to have been about a prankster who was harassing Cohen and not about the payoff. Hopefully this isn't too damaging to the prosecution's case.
The defence fucked up claiming he was biased because of his merchandise range.

Turns out they didn't research properly and the Merch he wears is produced by The Meidas Touch organisation.

I don't see it being too damaging as a lot of the evidence has been brought forward before he testified and Cohen just confirms what the prosecution have already primed the jurors with it.
 
The defence fucked up claiming he was biased because of his merchandise range.

Turns out they didn't research properly and the Merch he wears is produced by The Meidas Touch organisation.

I don't see it being too damaging as a lot of the evidence has been brought forward before he testified and Cohen just confirms what the prosecution have already primed the jurors with it.
 
The defence fucked up claiming he was biased because of his merchandise range.

Turns out they didn't research properly and the Merch he wears is produced by The Meidas Touch organisation.

I don't see it being too damaging as a lot of the evidence has been brought forward before he testified and Cohen just confirms what the prosecution have already primed the jurors with it.
A cool encounter.
Defense Attorney: (roughly) “Don’t you sell anti Trump merchandise on your site?”
Cohen: “No.”
 
What does President Shitgibbon expect when he has a reputation for not paying anyone that defends him in court.

Pay peanuts and all that...
Todd Blanche is a lawyer with a good rep. He was a partner in a prestigious firm but resigned to become Trump’s full time defender. He will never recover his rep. after defending the indefensible.
 
During cross, Cohen seems to have been caught in a lie about the topic of a phone call he had. Cohen claims the call was about the Stormy Daniels payoff; however - text messages immediately preceding the call indicate that the topic was much more likely to have been about a prankster who was harassing Cohen and not about the payoff. Hopefully this isn't too damaging to the prosecution's case.
I haven’t seen any redirect but this can be adequately dealt with at that point.
Prosecutor: “Did you lie about that call?”
Cohen: “No”
Prosecutor: “ Is it possible you misremembered and made a mistake?”
Cohen: “Of course that is possible but I am pretty sure that my testimony is correct.”
 
I haven’t seen any redirect but this can be adequately dealt with at that point.
Prosecutor: “Did you lie about that call?”
Cohen: “No”
Prosecutor: “ Is it possible you misremembered and made a mistake?”
Cohen: “Of course that is possible but I am pretty sure that my testimony is correct.”
I don't think that this can be dealt with so easily on redirect. I left out some of the details in my initial post. Here's MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell's description of the cross:


1. The call was initially to Keith Schiller who then supposedly connected to Trump. This in itself isn't unusual as calls to Trump were screened by Keith so calling Schiller was the typical way to contact Trump
2. Cohen claimed during initial testimony that this call was about the payoff to Stormy
3. Text messages between Cohen and Schiller immediately prior to the call were about a prankster who was harassing Cohen and what could be done about it;
4. Just prior to the call, Schiller texted "call me." Obviously Cohen called Schiller to discuss the prankster harassment;
5. Once the defense brought up the text messages between Cohen and Schiller, Cohen, under pressure stated that the initial topic was about the prankster, but then he was connected to Trump to discuss the payoff;
6. According to phone logs, this call lasted only 90 seconds or so (exactly 1 minute, 36 seconds).
7. The defense pointed out the obvious - how likely is it to discuss what to do about a prankster and then to be connected to Trump to discuss payments to Stormy in only 90 seconds or so.
===
Point 5 is key. Cohen is almost certainly wrong about this call and his ego got the best of him. The call is obviously about what to do about a prankster.

Yes, on redirect, the defense could ask Cohen if he was wrong about the call and if some other call was the one in which he supposedly discussed payoff arrangements with Trump.

And yes, Cohen might admit this.

But then why did Cohen insist that this call was exclusively about payoff arrangements? Point 2.
===
It's clear that Cohen seems to be lying about this call. Maybe the defense can come up with some other calls which fit Cohen's description 2. Except for point 5. Cohen claims that this very call was the one.
===
Cohen is a serial liar and the defense caught him. And the defense did a great job tying Cohen to this call and then discrediting him.
===
FWIW - I think that Trump is guilty as hell.

Maybe some other phone call by Cohen was about payoff arrangements. This call almost certainly wasn't.

Cohen's ego got the better of him - now the jury is going to wonder how credible Cohen's testimony is.
===
In sum, this may well be a "if the glove doesn't fit, don't convict" moment.

Cohen's fragile credibility is now totally shattered - but hopefully the preponderance of other evidence is convincing to all jurors.
 
Last edited:
Todd Blanche is a lawyer with a good rep. He was a partner in a prestigious firm but resigned to become Trump’s full time defender. He will never recover his rep. after defending the indefensible.
The problem with being a Trump lawyer is you have to take advice from the client. Should be the other way round but Trump won't listen to lawyers. He sees it all as an opportunity to get his stupid world view out there and expect ls the court/joury to just accept his BS.

Tried it with EJ Carol and lost.

Tried it with NY civil fraud and lost big.

Trying again here and he will lose.
 
Hmmm. What happened after lunch?
Beats me. Don't be so elliptic. What happened? - because Cohen's testimony about this call is shot.

I think that the call Cohen claims to have occurred probably did occur - but this particular call wasn't it. And yet Cohen doubled down by stating that this was certainly the call but that the initial topic was about a prankster.

Cohen's testimony about this call is complete rubbish - Cohen probably mixed up this call with another one, but he then doubled down on that this particular call for certain was the very call about Stormy payoffs he had with Trump - bullshit.

Cohen is a lying fuck who is out to get Trump and has created a media presence to support himself. I don't trust anything Cohen says at all.

And Cohen's ego is such that he'll back his mistakes 100% - even when incredible. Whereas he might have been mistaken and some other event was as he described.
===
That said, Trump is guilty as fuck here. Unfortunately the defense has had to call Cohen to support some of their points. And the lying shitbag Cohen was caught out in some of his testimony.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.