Gremlin
Well-Known Member
He’s ready
Not good enough for City
Opinion is divided, then!
He’s ready
Not good enough for City
The buy back clause only let us skip the negotiation with the club. If Luiz doesn’t wanna come, we’re not gonna force him. I don’t think we would put in a buy back clause without having some sort of confirmation from the player that he would be open to returning at some point, thoughIf we come up with the fee, does he have to come back to us?
Of course we would. If any club wants to pay £50 mill for him, we’ll buy him back for £27mill & sell him ourselves. Much like the Spanish clubs have done in the pastThe buy back clause only let us skip the negotiation with the club. If Luiz doesn’t wanna come, we’re not gonna force him. I don’t think we would put in a buy back clause without having some sort of confirmation from the player that he would be open to returning at some point, though
Yes, if he goes to any other club we would buy him first and sell him on, but we’re not gonna sign him and force him to stay if he doesn’t wanna be hereOf course we would. If any club wants to pay £50 mill for him, we’ll buy him back for £27mill & sell him ourselves. Much like the Spanish clubs have done in the past
Or like we’ve already done with Angelino
Don’t disagree with that, but definitely don’t agree with your assertion that we would only insert a buy back if the player was 100% interested in returning.Yes, if he goes to any other club we would buy him first and sell him on, but we’re not gonna sign him and force him to stay if he doesn’t wanna be here
When we inserted a sell on clause instead of a buy back for Sancho I would have thought that he either doesn’t wanna come back or we wouldn’t want him back due to attitude reasons etc. A buy back to me sounds more like some sort of agreement about potentially coming back. I was thinking out loud about the returning bit. Don’t read too much into it. The point I tried to made was that we didn’t have to negotiate with VillaDon’t disagree with that, but definitely don’t agree with your assertion that we would only insert a buy back if the player was 100% interested in returning.
Rodri is great and I think he would be the first choice for most of the «big games», whereas Luiz would be more of a backupHowever, to caveat that, unless moving to an elite club, why wouldn’t a player be interested in coming back to challenge for trophies?
I agree. We need someone to give Rodri competition though and from what I have seen, Luiz could do that. Fern will be away, maybe at the end of this season. Do we rely on Doyle as the backup or Gundo? Or do we buy Luiz (or similar) maybe for a season or two until we know Tommy Doyle is the real deal.When we inserted a sell on clause instead of a buy back for Sancho I would have thought that he either doesn’t wanna come back or we wouldn’t want him back due to attitude reasons etc. A buy back to me sounds more like some sort of agreement about potentially coming back. I was thinking out loud about the returning bit. Don’t read too much into it. The point I tried to made was that we didn’t have to negotiate with Villa
Rodri is great and I think he would be the first choice for most of the «big games», whereas Luiz would be more of a backup
Fair comments mate. Possibly correct. Personally I’d have thought it would depend on the buying club & what we agree with them, but what you’re saying also makes perfect sense to me fella :)When we inserted a sell on clause instead of a buy back for Sancho I would have thought that he either doesn’t wanna come back or we wouldn’t want him back due to attitude reasons etc. A buy back to me sounds more like some sort of agreement about potentially coming back. I was thinking out loud about the returning bit. Don’t read too much into it. The point I tried to made was that we didn’t have to negotiate with Villa
Rodri is great and I think he would be the first choice for most of the «big games», whereas Luiz would be more of a backup