MSP
Well-Known Member
Re: Eden Hazard
Oh my God, that statement requires starting it from the beginning again despite everything already said and I'm really kinda sleepy to play mind games with you.
He has 25+ years of playing at high level. Fair enough? :)
pudge said:Discussion started when you said we should sign him because he's 15 years old, which didn't make sense.MSP said:sjk2008 said:I'm with you here Pudge. Giggs & Scholes are still playing at the top level. In the last 4 years, they've featured in 2 Champions League Finals and won 3 Premiership trophies.
Yes they are on the decline and that is down to the fact they are past their footballing prime. That isn't the same as not playing at the top level.
The main point is that players like Giggs, Scholes (of bloody course they were great players not much time ago), Maldini, Del Piero and likes (it's silly to mention goalkeepers here as it's pretty normal that their careers last much longer) are "mistake of nature" not something that is usual in modern football world.
Discussion started when someone said that Hazard still has 15+ years of playing at top level. I think it is a ridiculous statement for someone who's 21 years old. 99% of players finish their careers before 35 or cash their name and glory in MLS, China or Middle East.
Oh my God, that statement requires starting it from the beginning again despite everything already said and I'm really kinda sleepy to play mind games with you.
He has 25+ years of playing at high level. Fair enough? :)