Eden Hazard (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Red_fan said:
I don't know if you have trouble reading, but I said at Swansea, Stoke, Arsenal, Everton, West Brom and Sunderland
Now now you're being slightly bitter don't you think.

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.


Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.
 
vincent said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Now now you're being slightly bitter don't you think.

How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.


Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.


Well different people have different perceptions of things don't they?

The fact is that the United attack yielded near identical results to the City attack throughout the whole season.
 
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
Red_fan said:
How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.
The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly
 
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.
 
Red_fan said:
vincent said:
Red_fan said:
How so? I'm not the one who dragged the thread off topic. I just replied to an insinuation that the City attack is far better than United's, when it's clearly not. And then an example of one game was given to me when the United attack was anonymous and I replied by giving several examples of when the City attack was very poor, or anonymous as well.

That's all mate. I don't see how I'm being bitter.


Interesting that the majority of reds I know who have season tickets have said Uniteds front line (with the exception of Rooney) and midfield is extremely poor and not in the same class as Citys. They're amazed United kept pace with City all season long.


Well different people have different perceptions of things don't they?

The fact is that the United attack yielded near identical results to the City attack throughout the whole season.

but not when it really mattered
wigan away and us away you came up short
think that is the difference
 
Red_fan said:
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.
fuck off back to sad cafe then!!!
 
Red_fan said:
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a CD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.

That's exactly what it is HISTORY, we're talking.................
 
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Paulmcfc2703 said:
The game that was given was because Hazard was there

Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

Heard anything about Bale mate or any other signings ?
 
Red_fan said:
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....

Nah seriously, your baiting is childish.
Do you pronounce it as istree now?
 
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)
True. It's fucking difficult to win a derby away from home!
Derby-Manchester-United-vs-Manchester-City-1-6-Video_crop_650x440.jpg
<br /><br />-- Fri May 25, 2012 1:19 pm --<br /><br />
Red_fan said:
If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....
As if the last 20 years actually matter when he would be joining the current team in the current situation.

You sound like a scouser
 
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
 
SWP's back said:
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)
True. It's fucking difficult to win a derby away from home!
Derby-Manchester-United-vs-Manchester-City-1-6-Video_crop_650x440.jpg


-- Fri May 25, 2012 1:19 pm --

Red_fan said:
If only we could fit the last 20 years on a DVD....
As if the last 20 years actually matter when he would be joining the current team in the current situation.

You sound like a scouser

Exactly what i was thinking but i think you put it better lol
 
SWP's back said:
As if the last 20 years actually matter when he would be joining the current team in the current situation.

You sound like a scouser
I guess the fact that I was joking went right over your head then, yeah?
 
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.

We beat them 1-6 in there back yard unless they demolish us by the same score we have a few years of that one
 
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.


OK but with all that "History" its nice to keep prospective of where we are at.
 
allan harper said:
Danamy said:
Red_fan said:
Fair enough, but still, Hazard would have to be very stupid to judge both teams on one game especially considering our lineup and the circumstances of us only needing a point. (and the fact that we were away from home)

No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

Heard anything about Bale mate or any other signings ?

Nothing on Bale at the moment allan, i'll give you the heads up if anything changes though
 
Mark - TheBlue said:
Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
 
Danamy said:
allan harper said:
Danamy said:
No worries as we sent him a copy of the 1-6 so he could judge properly

Heard anything about Bale mate or any other signings ?

Nothing on Bale at the moment allan, i'll give you the heads up if anything changes though

Nice one mate, I'll leave you to finish off that Rag !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top