It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.Mark - TheBlue said:Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.Mark - TheBlue said:Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
The same could be said about bringing up the games we played poorly in.Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.Mark - TheBlue said:Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
It's a dvd of the next twenty years you need to worry about coz you won't figure in it all that often.Red_fan said:I guess the fact that I was joking went right over your head then, yeah?SWP's back said:As if the last 20 years actually matter when he would be joining the current team in the current situation.
You sound like a scouser
Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.Mark - TheBlue said:Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
jonmcity said:Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.Mark - TheBlue said:Can no one on here talk about football without acting like kids. The way some blues band about the 6-1 win is cringey. Back to Hazard now.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
jonmcity said:Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
Paulmcfc2703 said:The same could be said about bringing up the games we played poorly in.Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.Paulmcfc2703 said:Like it or not the 6-1 was huge and contributed to the goal difference that won us the league. Red Fan said about how they played away, so did Danamy. Don't see your problem TBH.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
Mark - TheBlue said:jonmcity said:Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
He would fit in both sides. Playing behind Rooney or playing behind Aguero for us. If he joins us I do think Nasri's game time will be more limited though. But hazard Silva and Yaya supporting Aguero sounds good for us!
Oh you were asking the United fan haha my bad.
Red_fan said:Paulmcfc2703 said:The same could be said about bringing up the games we played poorly in.Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
That was just a retort to the claim that the City attack is way better than ours. There was no baiting there.
Seriously, can we just move on from this petty squabbling and talk about Eden Hazard?
It does sound good however I think Mancini will rest Silva much more he has been struggling with an injury through much of last season. At the end of last season it was Silva coming off not Nasri.Mark - TheBlue said:He would fit in both sides. Playing behind Rooney or playing behind Aguero for us. If he joins us I do think Nasri's game time will be more limited though. But hazard Silva and Yaya supporting Aguero sounds good for us!
Oh you were asking the United fan haha my bad.
Red_fan said:jonmcity said:Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
Absolutely no idea mate. It seems like Eden Hazard is the only one that knows that.
Some signs look good. IMO he would have more chance of playing in his preferred position with us (and more regularly) and we do have the Ronaldo factor. It must surely be a massive attraction for Hazard to see how we developed Ronaldo the way we did. And then there are a couple of reports in France that he's leaning towards us, and Sky reported the same thing. On the other hand it's likely that City and Chelsea will have offered significantly more money.
As I said though, I have no idea where he'll end up, completely up in the air.
Red_fan said:jonmcity said:Red_fan said:It was significant, just like the other 37 games.
I don't think Mark minds people mentioning it in that context, but trying to bait a United fan with it in the middle of a transfer thread about Eden Hazard is cringeworthy in fairness.
So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
Absolutely no idea mate. It seems like Eden Hazard is the only one that knows that.
Some signs look good. IMO he would have more chance of playing in his preferred position with us (and more regularly) and we do have the Ronaldo factor. It must surely be a massive attraction for Hazard to see how we developed Ronaldo the way we did. And then there are a couple of reports in France that he's leaning towards us, and Sky reported the same thing. On the other hand it's likely that City and Chelsea will have offered significantly more money.
As I said though, I have no idea where he'll end up, completely up in the air.
Rorz88 said:Red_fan said:jonmcity said:So do you honestly think he is coming to you?
Absolutely no idea mate. It seems like Eden Hazard is the only one that knows that.
Some signs look good. IMO he would have more chance of playing in his preferred position with us (and more regularly) and we do have the Ronaldo factor. It must surely be a massive attraction for Hazard to see how we developed Ronaldo the way we did. And then there are a couple of reports in France that he's leaning towards us, and Sky reported the same thing. On the other hand it's likely that City and Chelsea will have offered significantly more money.
As I said though, I have no idea where he'll end up, completely up in the air.
What is this Ronaldo factor you speak of ? what does it even mean ? He was always going ot be a great player regardless of who he played for, he just needed to work at it. It doesnt mean that if Hazard signs for you the same thing is going to happen, plus Ronaldo played with some good players, not like who Hazard is going to play with......
I think anyone would develp more playing with Aguero, Silva, Yaya, Kompany, don you think ?
LoveCity said:In addition to telling his suitors that he wants to play a specific position, he's now suggesting he wants the number 10 shirt too wherever he goes ("I have always dreamed of playing the number 10 role, and wearing that number on my back."). I wonder if he'll want a say in his destination club's transfer policy next. Anyway...
Dzeko is our #10
Shrek is their #10
Mata is Chelsea's #10
MSP said:but number 7 guys, we are all supposed to wank on that iconic shirt, lol