You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Eden Hazard (continued)
- Thread starter sam-caddick
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
whyalwaysyou
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2012
- Messages
- 222
alky313 said:whyalwaysyou said:Its not goal reporting it.... it's L'Equipe, pretty reliable source when it comes to French football news
They had been reporting Nasri to United for some time.
But that is the way it was looking for some time. The story (hazard to CFC) may be bullshit, but i wouldnt discredit l'equipe
colinbellsock
Member
- Joined
- 13 May 2012
- Messages
- 13
Just chill over eden, and stop believing the crap the papers and media are spinning. They dont know where he is going and as such are just making up any old s*** or believing any bit of gossip they hear.He has known for a while where he wants to go and is loving all the stories about where he is going and his so call demands,and will point all these out when he signs.Iam 110% certain he will be playing for us next season.
southern muppet
Well-Known Member
It's been fairly obvious to me since the start that Hazard won't go to United. It's us or Chelsea IMO.
What will be will be, if he goes to the rags he will be part of the fall from glory. We will have at least made them pay more for the transfer and higher wages. If he comes to us good, but we cant expect him to be the big difference in wining the Champions league. he is a young player with potential who will need a couple of years to be at his best. The rags need a big statement to say they are at least trying to keep up with us. They wont of course in the long run, the banks will be calling in the loans soon. Chelsea don't have any direction or cohesive policy in place, cant see them being a massive threat next season.
alky313 said:whyalwaysyou said:Its not goal reporting it.... it's L'Equipe, pretty reliable source when it comes to French football news
They had been reporting Nasri to United for some time.
Could we let Nasri go to United and bring in Hazard instead? I know who i'd rather have....................
I think a big part of the reason Hazard changed his mind about coming to us is that we already have three similar players all vying for the same places that he wants to occupy: Tevez, Nasri and Silva. I think Hazard would probably be better than Tevez and certainly better than Nasri.
Also, Mancini doesnt play wingers which is why AJ and Milner cant get a game. Hazard will be aware of this.
Chelsea and United both have 'vacancies' for that role - which is why he's attracted there, and it could see both clubs changing their respective formations to match ours i.e. 4-2-3-1 and why both have been trying to get the inferior Modric on board too.
Marvin said:Chelsea don't have a manager. Obvious point, but if a player was torn between 2-3 clubs, that might tip the balance. Certainly doesn't help CFC
Maybe so but Guardiola has recently said that he may come back to football if he were to recieve a fantastic offer (or words to that effect)
Its highly likely that Chelski have indicated whom there next manager is going to be and even if they have not then they will get a decent one.
They have been in the CL semi for a few years now and regularily win silverwear and add to that its in London it would not a massively suprising decision if true - personally i hope it is because Chelski need to spend lots more with their ageing squad - personally i think if he goes to United and they get that Dortmund chap they will be much much stronger
ANY1aBLUE said:alky313 said:whyalwaysyou said:Its not goal reporting it.... it's L'Equipe, pretty reliable source when it comes to French football news
They had been reporting Nasri to United for some time.
Could we let Nasri go to United and bring in Hazard instead? I know who i'd rather have....................
I think a big part of the reason Hazard changed his mind about coming to us is that we already have three similar players all vying for the same places that he wants to occupy: Tevez, Nasri and Silva. I think Hazard would probably be better than Tevez and certainly better than Nasri.
Also, Mancini doesnt play wingers which is why AJ and Milner cant get a game. Hazard will be aware of this.
Chelsea and United both have 'vacancies' for that role - which is why he's attracted there, and it could see both clubs changing their respective formations to match ours i.e. 4-2-3-1 and why both have been trying to get the inferior Modric on board too.
You could see Ferguson switching to a 4-2-3-1? Along with Chelseas unnamed tacticless manager?
Doubtful. I don't think people realize how much the media is playin into Hazards mind games. We often blame agents and players for stroking the flames but this would be a lot easier if the fans just took the player for his word. It's not like Hazard dispelling his every notion to the media, and if he did it's not like his agents would be truthful.
It seems smart to me for a player to say hes going to United to grab more money from City's grasp. It also seems smart to include a tertiary buyer so the clubs know if thy both stand firm neither will get him.
Just wait and see. No matter where he goes he will get 35 total games at least in his preferred position. He will play in whatever free role best suits him as Nasri/Silva and even Milner have in the past.
whyalwaysyou
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2012
- Messages
- 222
According to few lads on Lille forum, L'Equipe are very reliable. And Hazard to Chelsea, with City pulling out is all over French media today
- Status
- Not open for further replies.