Eden Hazard (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lord BLue said:
i thought he said he was going to announce his decision after the england belgium game. my head hurts.
Click to expand...

He's undecided about when to make his decision.
 
I don't think United would allow it to happen, Chelsea definatley and us possibly.

Its between us and Chelsea IMO!

If he announces on Twitter it United I would be suprised. Fergie would not condone it wheras we could look it as promotion maybe!
 
Quinninho said:
Is Hazzard out of contract and that is why a fee does not need to be negociated? I would have though permission etc must be sought from a club, fee agreed, future bonuses etc?

4pm on twitter is the social media equivalent of the 4:00 press conference I reckon!
Click to expand...

what.jpg
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
This latest so-called 'development' is the most bizarre yet.

To allow a player to announce his transfer on Twitter, says more about Hazard and the games he appears to have played for nigh on ten days.

Neither City or United would allow this direction.

24 hours ago he was nailed on according to 'L'Equipe to have chosen United.

City have long made their stance clear to his agent.
Click to expand...

This is his quote from Twitter ...

"good afternoon guys. i made up my mind. see you later. thanks"

It doesn't say he's going to announce who he's going to on Twitter, so calm the fuck down everybody!
 
zola said:
C_T_I_D said:
Hulk - Torres - Hazard.

Not bad but not premiership winning material either!
Click to expand...


Not with just three players but with ;

-----Mata---
Ramires---Lampard
Ivanovic -Terry - Cahill - Cole
---Cech---

behind them it certainly is.
Click to expand...

You're backing two players to help pick up the distance between City and Chelsea?
 
Christ he isn't half milking this transfer. It wouldn't surprise me if we're none the wiser about this transfer this time next week.

If he goes to Chelea then so be it. He looks a quality player but there are plenty of other options out there, and to be honest, i'd rather we address our central midfield/defence first as those are the positions we lack cover in.

Be interesting to see whats going with Chelsea though, is Roman going to sign who he wants and then appoint Di Matteo? Surey no manager would take the job when the owner is signing the players. Unless, of course, they've found a new manager and he's involved in this transfer also.
 
OB1 said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
This latest so-called 'development' is the most bizarre yet.

To allow a player to announce his transfer on Twitter, says more about Hazard and the games he appears to have played for nigh on ten days.

Neither City or United would allow this direction.

24 hours ago he was nailed on according to 'L'Equipe to have chosen United.

City have long made their stance clear to his agent.
Click to expand...

Your faith waning then?
Click to expand...


It's not a question of faith, just an example that many 'respected' outlets have attempted to give a definitive conclusion over the last week.

It has always been the case City made an offer and would not bend to other demands.

All this latest should be treated with the same amount of caution as everything else in recent days, until he finally puts up.
 
C_T_I_D said:
zola said:
C_T_I_D said:
Hulk - Torres - Hazard.

Not bad but not premiership winning material either!
Click to expand...


Not with just three players but with ;

-----Mata---
Ramires---Lampard
Ivanovic -Terry - Cahill - Cole
---Cech---

behind them it certainly is.
Click to expand...

You're backing two players to help pick up the distance between City and Chelsea?
Click to expand...

Two players, a manager playing a formation thats suits, as well as having the backing of the squad... Possibly.
 
C_T_I_D said:
Hulk - Torres - Hazard.

Not bad but not premiership winning material either!
Click to expand...

That may look good on paper but what happens on the pitch could and sometimes usually never lives up to the bill.
 
brian the blue said:
Christ he isn't half milking this transfer. It wouldn't surprise me if we're none the wiser about this transfer this time next week.

If he goes to Chelea then so be it. He looks a quality player but there are plenty of other options out there, and to be honest, i'd rather we address our central midfield/defence first as those are the positions we lack cover in.

Be interesting to see whats going with Chelsea though, is Roman going to sign who he wants and then appoint Di Matteo? Surey no manager would take the job when the owner is signing the players. Unless, of course, they've found a new manager and he's involved in this transfer also.
Click to expand...

Roman is doing Chelsea signings for years, where have you been?

Who else signed Torres?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
This latest so-called 'development' is the most bizarre yet.

To allow a player to announce his transfer on Twitter, says more about Hazard and the games he appears to have played for nigh on ten days.

Neither City or United would allow this direction.

24 hours ago he was nailed on according to 'L'Equipe to have chosen United.

City have long made their stance clear to his agent.
Click to expand...
Could city have given him an ultimatum sign up or we move on?
 
SWP's back said:
If and it's a bif IF, he goes to Chelsea then it's one in the eye for those that were supporting Chelsea in the final. I said we shouldnt.
Click to expand...


Still worth it for the LOLs at Spurs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top