richards30 said:not for me i`m afraid mate. why keep scholes and giggs then?? surely they`re not playing for free? they are financially in the shit and theres no way they`re gonna pay hazard the sort of money he wants!! how long would they pay the fee over??? 10 years? 15 years?dctid said:route46 said:still dont see utd as a runner in this,if the lad is having second thoughts its more likely to be chelsea rather then utd.
United is a far far more obvious bet than City in my opinion
Wages are gong to be similar maybe 10K - 20K a week difference if that
Rags need an attacking / creative midfield player - Hazard is not a winger at Lille yes he can play it but he plays behind the striker
and crucially with a midfield of Barry - Yaya - Milner - Nasri - Silva how many games is he going to get because he will struggle
Rags nailed on me thinks
Ferguson is hardly going to let these two players go for a 21 year old un proven in the prem - look at how De Gau started last season - he will keep these players and rotate
They are thread bare in midfield its clear to see relying on two OAP's - Nasri was targeted by Rags last season and now Hazard is being targetd for exactly the same reason
The question is can they afford to NOT buy him - there is absolutely no way that rags will roll over and will fight tooth and nail - dont be soo blind that you think they are skint they may be tight but they will spunk cash if they have too - ultimately they have no option if they are to remain competative next season<br /><br />-- Mon May 21, 2012 1:05 pm --<br /><br />
SWP's back said:There would be 3 for 2 spaces at ours. Left or right of a front 3.dctid said:Paulmcfc2703 said:If thats the case I wont be overly bothered because it means Valencia will get less games.
Have to say as a winger which is what we need i rate Valencia highly but cant see him being used as a winger at the rags
More creative midfield player exactly the same role they wanted Nasri for
Still trying to get my head around how / where he would play for City can only guess we would rotate Silva and Hazard as David looked more than a little shagged towards the end of the season
Or as a playmaker behind the front three. Or as winger in a 442 if we need to change things. Mancini likes his players to be versatile and most of our little attacking sausages change their position in games anyway.
Yes but you have Aguero / Ballo / Tevez or another striker to get games for - AJ has not even been mentioned yet - Miilner dont get a kick of the ball - Yaya best position is when he is pushed forward but that means the loss of Silva or Nasri
I understand what you are saying but we as a team dont play with much width and the inclusion of hazard is unlikely to change that