Excellent conundrum CB.Do you not think that IF the doomsday scenarios don’t materialize, there will be some middle ground that will appease all sides? Some level of choice that enablers everyone to win?
Again, only if the science shows the things are not deteriorating or occurring at the pace policy makers once believed.
We will find a balance its never as bad as the worst scenarios paint but never as good as the deniers think it would be if nothing was done to reduce reliance on fossil fuels etc.
Global warming deniers have their heads in the sand so to speak based on the science however how to respond in an ethical , equitable , environmentally and economically effective manner is the challenge.
the aim of any generation should be to leave the world in a better place for the next generation and so on.
I don't believe government and policy makers alone are the solution and I know they will not be CB.
it will evolve over time , the environment is incredibly resilient , humans as well however our inhumanity to each other I see as a bigger threat to our longevity than pumping c02 into the air.
The world has finite resource and our population growth is the biggest challenge into the centuries ahead CB.