Emergency keeper loan / Hart / Brum [All merged]

[DaveH]

Why are City so scared of upsetting the FA
First the Ade sending off against Stoke, we just rolled over and took it.
Now this (unfair advantage) what about wolves and fulham fielding weakened teams.

 

[1.618034]

Fuck off Fulop, rather have Gunnar

Will you be saying that on Saturday?

 

[Theo555]

Fuck the FA - they will be bending over backwards to help us out in the coming years.

This decision is ridiculous but will make me shout out for the boys 50% louder than i was!

The players will also feel how we do - this is going to spur us on and Fulop will give his all for us - this is his big chance to impress

 

[Tricky_Trev]

If we defend well, it doesn't matter who we have in net.

 

[SWPISHOME]

Fuck off Fulop, rather have Gunnar

Will you be saying that on Saturday?

We have to get behind Fulop now he will be our No.1 keeper for the last 3 games, And Fulop will definetly want to impress Mancini. In all honesty I think we would all rather Martin Fulop! Gunnar Nielsen has no Premier League experience and Fulop has played alot for Sunderland this season so it was a good move from us.

Come on Fulop!

 

[mad zab]

Unwiped, hairy fanny?

Wow - thanks fat boy.

Uncalled for that, apologies. From what I remember your fanny is infact very clean. Anyways, I don't take kindly to being singled out just because my opinion differs to the masses, even if that opinion has been hammered all day by me, which i know it had. I out fans into a few categories where we're concerned at the minute, and the majority of this thread seemed to fall into the 'we can do what we want' category, and as a seasoned fan, I don't like that cocky attitude, an attitude which only seems to have cropped up since our riches came. For me we loaned our future keeper to Brum on the following basis: That he stays there all season and so he gains PL experience. That deal benefited 3 parties, Brum us and Hart himself. Job done. Now though, now we have been inept enough to allow ourselves to let this situation occur, we want to change that deal slightly just so it benefits ONE party, us. We woudn't like it one bit if we were Brum and a club who not so long ago were on a par with us recalled someone we loaned off them, just because it suited them. It just seems some of our fans have this attitude where they want to see us do whatever it takes, even if it means making a twat of ourselves in the process. The loan was a gamble, a gamble which had 99% of a positive outcome for ALL 3 parties concerned, but which also had a very unlikely 1% which meant it could bite our balls, hard. Just because that 1% has come about though, it doesn't mean we can have it all our way and have 100% it all in our benefit. The gamble has paid in the long term, Hart has had an outstanding season and will be our number one for years to come, but its also now had an adverse effect, but for me that is our problem to deal with and we should not have expected people to have bent over backwards just to suit us, and it now seems everyone is having a paranoid pop at the FA because they haven't bent over backwards. If we wanted 2 first class keepers in the club incase this situation ever occurred, we should have risked Harts wrath and made him stay. We didn't though, we let him go on the proviso it was for a season long and so he got PL experience for our future benefit. We have to adhere to that, no matter what fuck up it puts us in. Again though, apologies for calling your hygiene and unkept appearance of your fanny. :-)

What an arrogant bastard you are!!

We let Joe go out on loan so that he could push for a place in the World Cup. If it wasn't a World Cup year he most probably would have stayed at the club as number 2 to Given.

No club can account for 3 senior goalkeepers getting injured.

Just like I have said in my previous post, you are a complete knobhead who is taking pleasure that we might fail to qualify for the Champions League, just because Hughes got sacked.

 

[Oasis_City]

So the PL won't let us have Hart back because it's an unfair advantage? Why aren't they doing anything about Aston Villas unfair advantage against Birmingham? :(

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

If we defend well, it doesn't matter who we have in net.

at least it aint Fabianski, god, he'd make a back line of Roberto Carlos, Maldini, Nesta and Cafu in their prime look dodgy.

 

[Blue Coop]

On 1 September, the goalkeeper made a string of superb saves against Plymouth Argyle to ensure Leicester a point at Home Park.[10] This would be the first of a number of fine performances from Fülöp. On 26 September, he repeated his string of superb saves which contributed in the team's shock victory over Aston Villa in the Carling Cup.[11] He was twice named in the Championship Team Of The Week, on 1 October and 22 October.

Fülöp made another fine performance against Chelsea in a Carling Cup match on 31 October, twice denying Claudio Pizarro and pushing an effort from Scott Sinclair onto the post, but could not prevent his side from losing 4–3.[14] His form during that season prompted the club to bid for him on a permanent basis in the January transfer window.

With Gordon's injuries Marton has become the first choice keeper and proved his worth with many fine performances to help keep Sunderland in the Premier League at the end of the 2008/09 season. He also got recognition for several saves made in the Premier League opener away to Bolton, which they won 1-0.

 

[Oasis_City]

So the PL won't let us have Hart back because it's an unfair advantage? Why aren't they doing anything about Aston Villas unfair advantage against Birmingham? :(