cleavers
Moderator
More than likely it will just be "disappointing".And rightly so. Proud of our wee nation, if tonight was nail biting then fuck knows how Tueaday will be.
More than likely it will just be "disappointing".And rightly so. Proud of our wee nation, if tonight was nail biting then fuck knows how Tueaday will be.
Sadly we are stuck with him for the next decade. An FA yes man who pretends to be Mr Nice Guy.Not for the first time I’m hoping for England to fail in order to hasten the exit of a useless national team manager.
As a group we have one of the best groups of young attacking players in decades so what does Southgate do? Sets up way too conservative, no creative midfield players. why…
Its fucking Sotland… and he sets up like we’re playing peak Brazil…
and the Scots on here… that pt won’t qualify you... so why celebrate like you’ve won something? Embarrassing all round…
Wouldn't bother me either, but it's just not even a sensible suggestion.True, unfortunately. Wouldn't bother me if he did go though
they’re not both defensive midfielders.He played two defensive midfielders. Against Scotland.
He admitted that he set the team up not to lose. Against Scotland.
He subbed arguably England's most dangerous player on the pitch after 62 minutes and then reverted to route one football.
He is a company man and totally out of his depth
Scotland were the better team. As Souness said it was a controlled performance, nothing to do with passion. If you had any sort of striker you could have won 3-0. It was a tactical victory for Steve Clarke...though Southgate made it easier for him.
Nothing personal mate, I suppose I just can’t comprehend celebrating a 0-0.And rightly so. Proud of our wee nation, if tonight was nail biting then fuck knows how Tueaday will be.
Southgate doesn't seem to like players that can create something out of absolutely nothing.Foden wont start the next game, he should but he won't
i cant jump on the Foden bandwagon tonight sorry. he wasnt much cop when he got the ball and his best work was tracking back.He’s played Foden out of position two games running, and takes him off despite being the best player in the pitch even though he was out of position.
A shithouse, that’s who. Takes the easiest player to substitute off, ****’s trick.He took the most exciting player off, what fuckwit would do that?
I agree, I would keep Phillips and drop Rice, but I think this England has a serious structural problem and the main issue is with Southgate himself unfortunately. And then there is Kane who is turning into a square peg in a round hole, with him upfront there is no way we can even start thinking about persistent high press, the cue our best performances were in the first 10 minutes of both games. Take him out and we have many more combinations with five up front and much more dynamic ones. But I gave up it's going to happen and we are going to continue reading articles where Kane cut a lonely figure and was isolated instead that he was crap.Thought Hanley was the MOTM. England have a problem with playing Rice and Phillips, personally I'd keep Phillips. That frees a space for Grealish who is desperately needed in midfield. Swap Sterling for Sancho and give Chilwell a bang at LB. Taking Foden off was bizarre, Kane isn't fit, he must be carrying an injury and if that's true then management need criticising for playing him......