English are 'anti-semitic'

Skashion said:
tueartsboots said:
You were saying that it's an Israeli/Palestinian issue. bith are British, pretty much, made within the last 100 years
I disagree with that, but for the sake of argument I'll accept it and simply say that the conflict is less than a hundred years old so your point is...
Please don't accept IT "for sake of argument" The British Empire carved up the world, look at a map of the world from 100 years ago. 80% is Pink, the first world war changed that as we we were skint
 
tueartsboots said:
Skashion said:
I disagree with that, but for the sake of argument I'll accept it and simply say that the conflict is less than a hundred years old so your point is...
Please don't accept IT "for sake of argument" The British Empire carved up the world, look at a map of the world from 100 years ago. 80% is Pink, the first world war changed that as we we were skint
Well Israel is mentioned prominently in the Bible and Palestine by Herodotus but why let that get in the way of your GCSE standard of a history lesson. Still, it's not relevant to the Palestinian conflict which is a modern conflict and is related to the First World War.
 
Skashion said:
tueartsboots said:
Please don't accept IT "for sake of argument" The British Empire carved up the world, look at a map of the world from 100 years ago. 80% is Pink, the first world war changed that as we we were skint
Well Israel is mentioned prominently in the Bible and Palestine by Herodotus but why let that get in the way of your GCSE standard of a history lesson. Still, it's not relevant to the Palestinian conflict which is a modern conflict and is related to the First World War.
The Bible, er well King James VERSION? Definition of version : the appropriate defintion at the time.
Published nearly 1600 yrs after the so called event
 
tueartsboots said:
Skashion said:
What is this post actually supposed to say?
It's a book of bollocks, written to suit those in charge at the time
Ok, this is going off on a major tangent. Do you accept there are ancient references to the lands currently known as Israel and the Palestinian territories as Israel/Palestine, yes or no?
 
Skashion said:
tueartsboots said:
It's a book of bollocks, written to suit those in charge at the time
Ok, this is going off on a major tangent. Do you accept there are ancient references to the lands currently known as Israel and the Palestinian territories as Israel/Palestine, yes or no?
TBH not really, the first "Bible" was diseminated and written by the Greeks. They were told to cull the "Gospels" hence why we only four.
Not a believer in the slightest
 
tueartsboots said:
Skashion said:
Ok, this is going off on a major tangent. Do you accept there are ancient references to the lands currently known as Israel and the Palestinian territories as Israel/Palestine, yes or no?
TBH not really, the first "Bible" was diseminated and written by the Greeks. They were told to cull the "Gospels" hence why we only four.
Not a believer in the slightest
So there was no ancient land of Israel then?
 
Skashion said:
tueartsboots said:
TBH not really, the first "Bible" was diseminated and written by the Greeks. They were told to cull the "Gospels" hence why we only four.
Not a believer in the slightest
So there was no ancient land of Israel then?
Doubt it, prove me wrong- not gloating but would be seriously interested
Going to bed but drop me a PM
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.