Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
A member of a family who have close protection at all times - why not just produce a print off of the log of the close protection squad on the night in question? None of this pizza express shit just hey - here's the contemporary Police notes on where I was on the night in question?
How far back are the logs held for?
 
How far back are the logs held for?

Be surprising if they weren't stored electronically and, given the profile of the royal family, if they weren't kept indefinitely. Regardless of records, if you're halfway through a Sloppy Giuseppe and Prince Andrew walks in with one of his kids and a very obvious security presence and grabs a table and a menu the chances are it'll stick in your memory.
 
Be surprising if they weren't stored electronically and, given the profile of the royal family, if they weren't kept indefinitely. Regardless of records, if you're halfway through a Sloppy Giuseppe and Prince Andrew walks in with one of his kids and a very obvious security presence and grabs a table and a menu the chances are it'll stick in your memory.
It was 2001 a lot less was stored electronically then. Personally I don't think the question is whether or not he went for the Pizza but what he did after which is why the log would be useful.
As an alibi the pizza is about as useful as saying I didn't have lunch because I had a shower that morning and I don't lunch when I shower.
 
It was 2001 a lot less was stored electronically then. Personally I don't think the question is whether or not he went for the Pizza but what he did after which is why the log would be useful.
As an alibi the pizza is about as useful as saying I didn't have lunch because I had a shower that morning and I don't lunch when I shower.

No doubt the establishment will close ranks, the press will give up on it, and gradually it'll be forgotten.
 
No doubt the establishment will close ranks, the press will give up on it, and gradually it'll be forgotten.
I agree , but would be interested in how long they store the logs out of curiosity because if they do store them that long and the log states he did not go to Tramps or Maxwells house it establishes his story . If they are kept that long and he hasn't used them it casts even more doubt.
 
This interview must have convinced the doubters that he is guilty when quite a few may have thought he wasn't or just didn't think about it that much.

There's no coming back from this.

Of course with him being mummy's favourite he'll always be indulged .....while she's still living of course.
 
I saw on CNN that a US Prosecutor wants Randy Pandy to give evidence over there. I hate popcorn but will make an exception if that comes to pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
so who do you think is going to take the heat of andy pandy and will be named as a major public icon as a pedophile to take the heat off him, they will name somebody very soon as this is a major embarrassment to the royals and the way they do thing is run a major story that will dilute this like somebody die's or point the finger at somebody else as a pedophile,

this story is not being brushed under the carpet by the media and internet sites, and people like david icke are now coming to fruit in what they said 20 years ago and the royals are in a mess and andy pandy will need something big to cover his arse or the head of the royals will order another car ride


 
Well some of my pension went to buying the yacht that Bob Maxwell decided to have a long swim off the back of, his daughter learnt from a master crook she will have done a deal alright no dirt will stick to her .
 
This interview must have convinced the doubters that he is guilty when quite a few may have thought he wasn't or just didn't think about it that much.

There's no coming back from this.

Of course with him being mummy's favourite he'll always be indulged .....while she's still living of course.
What is he guilty of though? Nobody has told me and Ive genuinely asked a few times through the thread
 
What is he guilty of though? Nobody has told me and Ive genuinely asked a few times through the thread

He’s accused at this point of time but the evidence, including that interview, seems pretty damning.

He’s accused of having sex with a trafficked girl of 17. OK not illegal in terms of age in Britain but that is illegal in the US and trafficking for that purpose is obviously illegal everywhere.

He did have sex with her in the US too, apparently, and he’s also accused of being at an orgy with loads of underage girls, as young as 14, although the evidence of that is less comprehensive but still the accusation is there.

From what I can see he’s accused of a minimum 3 things that are illegal.
 
He’s accused at this point of time but the evidence, including that interview, seems pretty damning.

He’s accused of having sex with a trafficked girl of 17. OK not illegal in terms of age in Britain but that is illegal in the US and trafficking for that purpose is obviously illegal everywhere.

He did have sex with her in the US too, apparently, and he’s also accused of being at an orgy with loads of underage girls, as young as 14, although the evidence of that is less comprehensive but still the accusation is there.

From what I can see he’s accused of a minimum 3 things that are illegal.
Ok thanks. If he is being accused are there any steps being made to prosecute?
 
He’s accused at this point of time but the evidence, including that interview, seems pretty damning.

He’s accused of having sex with a trafficked girl of 17. OK not illegal in terms of age in Britain but that is illegal in the US and trafficking for that purpose is obviously illegal everywhere.

He did have sex with her in the US too, apparently, and he’s also accused of being at an orgy with loads of underage girls, as young as 14, although the evidence of that is less comprehensive but still the accusation is there.

From what I can see he’s accused of a minimum 3 things that are illegal.
He’s a fucking wrong ‘un. I wish he could be charged with that.
 
There’s more chance of Merseyside police finding someone guilty for our bus incident, sadly mate.
No, thats a different thing. A finding of guilt by a jury. This is way before that isnt it. Are there any prosecutions planned and so investigations ongoing, based on criminal complaints from any victims?
 
No, thats a different thing. A finding of guilt by a jury. This is way before that isnt it. Are there any prosecutions planned and so investigations ongoing, based on criminal complaints from any victims?

Not that I’m aware of.

They’re asking him to give information in New York, to the FBI but I think the angle is to help them, rather than HRH being prosecuted.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top