Could you explain this please? Genuinely interested, as i'm sure are others, that like me, are not familiar with the ins and outs of law, especially when it's uk/ usa intertwined.None of things you mentioned are right
Could you explain this please? Genuinely interested, as i'm sure are others, that like me, are not familiar with the ins and outs of law, especially when it's uk/ usa intertwined.None of things you mentioned are right
The civil case she is bringing states:Could you explain this please? Genuinely interested, as i'm sure are others, that like me, are not familiar with the ins and outs of law, especially when it's uk/ usa intertwined.
Have you actually seen the interview? Anyone giving him the benefit after watching that needs to invest in this amazing Nigerian time share I’ve got available.Quite.
Any benefit he might have been given after the interview is now long gone.
Are you aware of the ‘Reply’ facility and the benefits it can provide?Of course I have and many people at the time accepted his opinion. He still has a team claiming the picture of him and her was photoshopped and people believing it.
In the same way there are people who are gullibly accepting that Charles isn’t up to his eyes in graft and corruption as his people tout access to him for money from Arab and Russian crooks.
She was trafficked, you do understand what that means ?The civil case she is bringing states:
Giuffre “was compelled by express or implied threats by Jeffrey Epstein, Maxwell, and/or Prince Andrew to engage in sexual acts with Prince Andrew, and feared death or physical injury to herself or another and other repercussions for disobeying Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew due to their powerful connections, wealth and authority”.
If you think a judge in a claim for cash is going to believe that, you will believe anything.
Just noticed you added this in after I had replied - and now I understand why you don’t quote other posters - because you are a spineless ****.Perhaps English isn’t your first language and your comprehension is limited.
Perhaps English isn’t your first language and your comprehension is limited. Of course I have and I didn’t believe a word of it but many people at the time accepted his opinion. He still has a team claiming the picture of him and her was photoshopped and people believing it.
In the same way there are people who are gullibly accepting that Charles isn’t up to his eyes in graft and corruption as his people tout access to him for money from Arab and Russian crooks.
Thats not trueShe was trafficked, you do understand what that means ?
You have been on the job too long wally