Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
simon Jordan made a great point, he reckons this is teams showing mino they won’t deal with his shite. No other reason for it than if a few teams agreed to show him who’s boss.

That’s a stupid take. We approached them, so did Chelsea and who know what other teams. The problem wasn’t Raiola, it was the Dortmund fee. That is super obvious. No club has a problem dealing with Raiola. That’s the kind of football forum talk with no relation to the real world. In real life people deal with assholes. And most agents are assholes
 
Surely its clear this ship has sailed.Otherwise we would not be 100% in for Kane and Chelsea would not have had to settle for Lukaku.

He was made for the Prem,and us,so its a huge shame.....but he has been tapped up by Bayern or,less probably,RM,i suspect.
I disagree. It's common knowledge that Haaland wants to play in the PL, I just hope he doesn't sign for the rags for next season.
 
One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?

But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.

And... another assist.
 
One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?

But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.

And... another assist.
I mean, I think kane, but okay
 
One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?

But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.

And... another assist.
That’s just ridiculous. it’s a team game and if the team plays as it should anyone could score first, could just as easily win a final with 2 John Stones goals. But if striker scores first or at all Haaland is no more likely than Kane, if the team creates chances.
This Haaland fanboy stuff is just daft, yes he’s a very good player, may become a great player but today he isn’t better than Kane, let alone Lewandowski, he isn’t better than peak Aguero. One day he might be, then again he might not.
 
One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?

But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.

And... another assist.

We all know how good Haaland is we all know we ain’t going to buy him so it’s pointless going on and on about it! Also we should get in our heads he be of to the scum next year because they will pay what it takes and Haaland agent knows the rags will sell him in few years time they will agree with a sell on..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.