simon Jordan made a great point, he reckons this is teams showing mino they won’t deal with his shite. No other reason for it than if a few teams agreed to show him who’s boss.
I disagree. It's common knowledge that Haaland wants to play in the PL, I just hope he doesn't sign for the rags for next season.Surely its clear this ship has sailed.Otherwise we would not be 100% in for Kane and Chelsea would not have had to settle for Lukaku.
He was made for the Prem,and us,so its a huge shame.....but he has been tapped up by Bayern or,less probably,RM,i suspect.
It is.
He's 21. He could move to a PL side in 2033.I disagree. It's common knowledge that Haaland wants to play in the PL, I just hope he doesn't sign for the rags for next season.
I mean, I think kane, but okayOne of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?
But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.
And... another assist.
I think you mean 2023 pal.He's 21. He could move to the PL side in 2033. I just hope it's not next year to the rags.
I'm thinking 3 moves from now.I think you mean 2023 pal.
That’s just ridiculous. it’s a team game and if the team plays as it should anyone could score first, could just as easily win a final with 2 John Stones goals. But if striker scores first or at all Haaland is no more likely than Kane, if the team creates chances.One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?
But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.
And... another assist.
One of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?
But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.
And... another assist.
If after September 1st we don’t have Kane in our squad, all the people maniacally defending Kane in every thread will change their tunes and will start arguing the project has to be Haaland next summer. Until then Kane is everything we have ever needed and a God etc... I get it. Let’s wait and see.I mean, I think kane, but okay
When he's 32 or 33?I'm thinking 3 moves from now.
To the rags. Obviously.When he's 32 or 33?
I don’t think that many people prefers Kane over Haaland. Seems to me that most people want Haaland. Although Kane is the better player at the moment and more complete I think it’s much closer than a lot of people believe. Kane wasn’t half the player of what Haaland is at 21. With Pep only having 2 years left on his contract it’s understandable he wants Kane, but I think we could be missing out on a future balon d’or winner hereOne of the takes that gets thrown around here a lot is that Kane, who is 28, is a more complete player than Haaland, who just turned 21. Is that supposed to mean anything? A player who’s 21 should already be complete?
But even then, who would people bet scores a goal against PSG in a Champions League final first, Haaland or Kane? Haaland all day.
And... another assist.
Next season I think, unfortunately.To the rags. Obviously.
Madrid Imo. I think he has wanted them all along.Next season I think, unfortunately.
They probably can’t afford both him and Mbappe and they’ll probably choose Mbappe first.Madrid Imo. I think he has wanted them all along.
i mean of course, if we can't get kane this summer then he wouldn't be worth to pursue anymore next summer because levy wouldn't change his price and he'll only be 1 years older. but so what? i am sorry, i'd still rather have harry kane. I don't change my mind because haaland had a great game against some bundesliga team.If after September 1st we don’t have Kane in our squad, all the people maniacally defending Kane in every thread will change their tunes and will start arguing the project has to be Haaland next summer. Until then Kane is everything we have ever needed and a God etc... I get it. Let’s wait and see.