D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
And the media narrative continues... let’s see how many fall for ittranslates to no clause exists and everything points to spain.
And the media narrative continues... let’s see how many fall for ittranslates to no clause exists and everything points to spain.
Only if you took the worst attributes of either.A combination of Ti Domi and Phil Kessel?
I was meaning Ti was a fighter and Kessel isn't ; )Only if you took the worst attributes of either.
The best of those two could skate, shoot and fight.
Well id argue Haaland is probably the most public and most expensive transfer to date. With how its dragged out already its definitely different from others.That's potentially the same situation with every player we have on our books though?
your right
but making so simple to name there price buying club instead of what we want selling club
i wish there was a way to keep players with buyout clauses in england and the premier league
have manchester city ever had to sell a player and got a transfer that makes sense or over his market value and value to the club ? ok torres was a profit but if he takes off at barcelona then that fee will be small
Have we ever had to sell a player? After the takeover that is. We're one of the very few clubs in the world that haven't had to sell a top player we really wanted to keep, so it's hard to find an example.
B-But a Ti(e)-fighter would never make the Kessel run in 12 parsecs.I was meaning Ti was a fighter and Kessel isn't ; )
I meant, City wouldn't be happy with him playing 5 seasons then just fucking off on a free.