Yeah but it's still an interesting enquiry I've always wondered about... I mean take Owen Hargreaves for instance was he actually seen as homegrown? Because he certainly wasn't by that interpretation of the law he wasn't born here and never lived here as a kid, Haaland did both for a while so in a certain sense he has more right to be classed as homegrown than a former England international.
Does birth here alone let you be classified as homegrown cos if not it should by common sense really, just look around there's clear cases right now of English/British/Irish kids playing abroad in foreign academies, they won't ever serve the 3 year term in their own nations or here, then you get foreign kids joining a club at 15 till 20 in England that equals homegrown, before they return to their home nation where they aren't recognised as having eligible home grown status, surely that's incorrect and can't strictly be right how would that be fair on the English or foreign born kid not being homegrown in their birth country?
There must be some kinda loophole but I've never seen a clear answer for it anywhere, personally I've never checked but it seems a very weird rule to me if Haaland isn't eligible, Giovanni Reyna at Dortmund is the same he should defo be homegrown here, both him and Haaland spent close to or over the first 4 years of their lives predominantly living here.