People saying they have more confidence in the signing of Kane over Haaland, claiming he's more suited to our team or better for us somehow, wow...
That's adorable possibly if a 4 year old is innocently saying that cos he likes some goals he scored but from an adult that is complete drivel, that's like saying Blackburn should've signed Steve Bull over Alan Shearer, it's like hearing someone say they think Colin Calderwood looked a better player for Spurs at centreback than a young Sol Campbell, or like saying Chris Powell is better than Ashley Cole for England back in 2001 while proclaiming he is just an overrated Arsenal kid... "get Powell back in the team" none of those are even slightly correct.
I'm pointing out the difference in class here because it's the very same I'm not even exaggerating, if you honestly believe Kane is a better option than Haaland for us, or will be more of a danger to opponents and more of a help to teammates... then you must believed some or all of the above examples to have been true for their time, Haaland is way above Kane in terms of levels or what he'd offer us.
Either, A: you're trolling. B: you're Arry Kane trying to convince us all you're a better option. Or, C: your judgement of football is so incomprehensibly poor at this time at least, that you should honestly take a break before you think to yourself what was I thinking.
Maybe your brain has gone into overdrive we all have brain farts at times and you're clearly having one bigtime, or maybe it's simply cos you clearly know nowt about football.
Whatever the case you need some advice, so here it is...
View attachment 39554
