We were prepared to offer than amount for Joao Felix 2 years ago so I would hope City wouldn't think twice about offering it for Haaland.It might seem like that. But just because we aren't willing to spend 80m on Harry Maguire. Doesn't mean that we wouldn't spend 100m+ on a player of Mbappes/Haalands quality.
I do think we are willing to go to 100m+ to replace Aguero.
If you watched the extended highlights you would have seen that he’s rapid.
The tweet literally says the club is willing to go above the 65m buyout clause and waive the sell on clause for Sancho....I hope no one in our club thinks we're getting him for 65m. If that's the type of budget, don't bother and look elsewhere.
I doubt anyone in our club does, unless we plan on waiting for his release clause to kick in.I hope no one in our club thinks we're getting him for 65m. If that's the type of budget, don't bother and look elsewhere.
I am just saying, it'll take double than that, so having to go over 65m should be pretty obvious.The tweet literally says the club is willing to go above the 65m buyout clause and waive the sell on clause for Sancho....
Nobody will be paying double that this summer. I can’t see any club paying much over £100 mill for a player that will be £65 mill next summer. Not sure there would be many that could afford it, I’d go as far as to say we are the only club that really only need to spend on one position and could afford around 100 mill on one player.I am just saying, it'll take double than that, so having to go over 65m should be pretty obvious.