You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 11,320
I think Chelsea getting into the champions league increases their chances of getting Haaland. Going to be a very interesting transfer window.
By the way, this was from last year
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 27,061
He’d be impressed if he saw our game today. Especially the performance of his mate Phil.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
Changed my mind
View attachment 17619
Puts me in mind of Jimmy Savile that
In blind fury by the look of things.Don't be deceived. That's Rutger Hauer.
mac
Well-Known Member
I want a striker that in 10 years we can look back on with the same sentiment as Kun. Kane isn't that.
Cityzen_89
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 870
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Imo we get Kane this summer and wait for Haalands release to kick in next year. £100m for Kane in this market means £150 - £200m for Haaland. Can't remember what his release is when it kicks in but it's a fraction of that.I want a striker that in 10 years we can look back on with the same sentiment as Kun. Kane isn't that.
David Silva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 1,159
Imo we get Kane this summer and wait for Haalands release to kick in next year. £100m for Kane in this market means £150 - £200m for Haaland. Can't remember what his release is when it kicks in but it's a fraction of that.
£68m.
Can’t see us being in the market for him by then if we shell out over 100m on Kane this year
Cityzen_89
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 870
- Team supported
- Manchester City
If we rotate Gabby and Torres with Mahrez on the wings and Sterling goes (who knows), Kane and Haaland would be our main strikers. As Kane ages Haaland becomes first choice. With our fixture build up all players would get plenty of game time. Financially on the other hand, depends who we sell/trade.£68m.
Can’t see us being in the market for him by then if we shell out over 100m on Kane this year
IF the release clause is 68 million, what do you think the agent fees and signing on fees will be?£68m.
Can’t see us being in the market for him by then if we shell out over 100m on Kane this year
I would say the deal next summer will be considerably more expensive than signing him this summer, we are realistically the only club that could afford him at this time, next summer there will be an auction of many clubs.
Just what Riaola wants!
IF the release clause is 68 million, what do you think the agent fees and signing on fees will be?
I would say the deal next summer will be considerably more expensive than signing him this summer, we are realistically the only club that could afford him at this time, next summer there will be an auction of many clubs.
Just what Riaola wants!
if he leaves next summer for that fee the agent and his dad get around 40m between them that the deal Mino did! He ain’t daft!
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 14,645
If we sign Kane we are not signing Haaland, not a chance he wants to come here and be any sort of rotation option or anything other than the main man.
David Silva
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 1,159
IF the release clause is 68 million, what do you think the agent fees and signing on fees will be?
I would say the deal next summer will be considerably more expensive than signing him this summer, we are realistically the only club that could afford him at this time, next summer there will be an auction of many clubs.
Just what Riaola wants!
I think there was some reports that the release clause includes 20m fees for both Alfie and Raiola but I haven’t ever seen that reported anywhere reliable. Imagine they probably wanted the same this year which may be what has pushed us on to Kane.
The point I am making is the agent fees, player signing on fee and player wages will be one big auction.I think there was some reports that the release clause includes 20m fees for both Alfie and Raiola but I haven’t ever seen that reported anywhere reliable. Imagine they probably wanted the same this year which may be what has pushed us on to Kane.
It will be crazy, wild west, the figures will be staggering and Riaola will sit back and love it.
Do we want someone like that, however good, to be part of our club?
Just look at Pep's interview about Kun yesterday, reduced to tears , that's the impact of not only a great player but a great man off the pitch.
Not a lover of Arry Kane, but I get the feel he will do everything and anything to join us, and that's great to see and the reason I think the club has identified him as the one.
Dribble
Well-Known Member
Fernandinho was older when we signed him....I want a striker that in 10 years we can look back on with the same sentiment as Kun. Kane isn't that.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
You can't possibly think that Haaland is going anywhere where he isn't first choice?If we rotate Gabby and Torres with Mahrez on the wings and Sterling goes (who knows), Kane and Haaland would be our main strikers. As Kane ages Haaland becomes first choice. With our fixture build up all players would get plenty of game time. Financially on the other hand, depends who we sell/trade.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.