Yes the Italians are famously easy to deal with.
Inter have no need to sell. He has no need to move. I'd personally rather one of your unknown 40m ones, than almost haaland money for lukaku.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Yes the Italians are famously easy to deal with.
Inter have no need to sell. He has no need to move. I'd personally rather one of your unknown 40m ones, than almost haaland money for lukaku.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
No my friend, you need some interpretation. I assume you missed the quote at the end. I linked to it for the curiousity of it all. The “young star wants Madrid” false narrative that repeats itself every other cycle and people still fall for it. I couldn’t find the story of a “bid”, but this was a player with a very known price tag that we and others pursued before he went on that fake “loan” to PSG. He had that price tag after Monaco eliminated us from UCL.I'm surprised, you of all people, would read that and come to the conclusion we bid 130m for him. A total nothing story with an irrelevant headline.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,899
I'm surprised, you of all people, would read that and come to the conclusion we bid 130m for him. A total nothing story with an irrelevant headline.
mbappe himself has already said he didn’t turn down pep but turned down Manchester City? Also I’m sure @tolmie's hairdoo has confirmed that we bid £120m but nothing ever progressed due to the above reason unfortunately.
He had a similar reputation to Haaland when he was around his age.Tell you what I like the lukaku though . He looks like a machine atm . More chance of getting a deal done with inter for him I think .
I don’t think we will, no. £100 mill is about €120 mill and I think that would do it,
Maximum we would go for me is €120 mill and maybe the Sancho sell on but not sure about that even. I really like Haaland and can see he might be first choice and think we have a good chance. We will however have a maximum and other options and I’m okay with that too.
And that Should be enough, and hopefully will. If it is us he wants to move to.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
This is the recipe for disaster that got Liverpool where they are now. Pep and City know betterWe have Pep city best signing ever! Even if we buy no one this summer Pep would have us competing for all trophies..
No my friend, you need some interpretation. I assume you missed the quote at the end. I linked to it for the curiousity of it all. The “young star wants Madrid” false narrative that repeats itself every other cycle and people still fall for it. I couldn’t find the story of a “bid”, but this was a player with a very known price tag that we and others pursued before he went on that fake “loan” to PSG. He had that price tag after Monaco eliminated us from UCL.
So, to conclude, there is no suggestion we ever bid anything for him, let alone 130m, even a vague one never mind a credible one.
That article borrows from 3 different time periods.
edit. for clarity i'm not trying tonargue we wouldn't but 130m for haaland.
Just that we didn't bid 130m for mbappe.
This is the recipe for disaster that got Liverpool where they are now. Pep and City know better
we know we going are going to be buying players! My point is Pep would have us competing for titles with the team we have now! Liverpool is a piss poor example
Centurions
Well-Known Member
What's your reasoning for that?Just think we will pull out of any bidding wars for haaland and don’t forget even though we are the richest club in the world we don’t just spend Monopoly money on players . I wish we would just pay it for haaland but don’t think we will and only way we do is if he wants to come to city. Which I also don’t believe he does .
- Status
- Not open for further replies.