Erling Haaland

[citytill1die84]

I can't see us buying Haaland AND Grealish, no way will we pay getting on for £200m for the two of them.

We absolutely would as both are long-term replacements and both have years in them.

 

[nyCITY]

You say that but quality players continue to go there season after season. Like it or not [Chelsea] have pulling power.

Because Chelsea are the only big club in London with deep pockets that have a) won UCL b) won PL recently (16/17) c) have depth and are trying to win.

The PL wages are the best in the world and the best players are naturally going to gravitate there. If someone wants to play in the PL and is not from England, London is the cultural center of the country and likely where he wants be unless City, rags or dippers are interested.

Chelsea is a winning project in a favorable city. Not hard to see why top talent want to go there.

Quite frankly, it really is amazing that they are the best London has to offer given the advantages the city offers culturally, economically and socially.

 

[MeatHunterrr]

Chelsea cannot be considered a winning project.

1 PL title every 5 seasons is nothing to shout about.

Chelsea have not signed elite player in ages. Last was Hazard and even he left.

They are firmly in tier 2 when it comes to ranking clubs.

And that is a failure considering money Abramovich has spent.

 

[FantasyIreland]

We absolutely would as both are long-term replacements and both have years in them.

Spot on,spread their cost over the 5-10 years we get to benefit from their brilliance and it will look like great business.

 

[Ashleymcduff]

Starting for Norway vs Gibraltar .. should bag a couple tonight

 

[nyCITY]

Chelsea cannot be considered a winning project.

1 PL title every 5 seasons is nothing to shout about.

Chelsea have not signed elite player in ages. Last was Hazard and even he left.

They are firmly in tier 2 when it comes to ranking clubs.

Who is a winning project besides us then?

They have probably the 2nd most squad talent in the PL, the won the Thursday Night Cup, an FA cup and PL all in the last five years. They’ve won a UCL more recently than rags, juve, inter, milan, and dortmund. They have won 2nd most PL titles (hopefully tied with us in a few weeks) with all coming since 2005.

Chelsea continue to spend, on players and infrastructure. Relative to most other teams in Europe they are a legit project trying to win trophies and it shows over the last 20 or so years.

 

[Centurions]

Chelsea cannot be considered a winning project.

1 PL title every 5 seasons is nothing to shout about.

Chelsea have not signed elite player in ages. Last was Hazard and even he left.

They are firmly in tier 2 when it comes to ranking clubs.

And that is a failure considering money Abramovich has spent.

Seriously? How many other clubs can equal or better that then?

 

[Eoiyflem]

Chelsea cannot be considered a winning project.

1 PL title every 5 seasons is nothing to shout about.

Chelsea have not signed elite player in ages. Last was Hazard and even he left.

They are firmly in tier 2 when it comes to ranking clubs.

And that is a failure considering money Abramovich has spent.

Sorry but this is complete bullshit.

5 PLs, fa cups, league cups, champions League plus another final, Europa League. They've won a bag full

 

[Deleted member 87819]

The Norway national team is a disgrace lol Unwatchable match

 

[FantasyIreland]

Starting for Norway vs Gibraltar .. should bag a couple tonight

Did he play?