Why is it hard for people to imagine that we'll let a player go without bringing a replacement?
Kompany, aguero
A bit different.
Why is it hard for people to imagine that we'll let a player go without bringing a replacement?
Kompany, aguero
Well I guess he had been injured for ages anyway and they assume our coach will just Pep his way out of it.The timing of letting Torres go is a strange one for me, end of the season no issue, but half way through a season you don't weaken a squad, however good our squad is.
Mahrez to african nations cup in January. It's hard to get the right players in the Winter market but I'd be surprised if they don't try something.Well I guess he had been injured for ages anyway and they assume our coach will just Pep his way out of it.
The timing of letting Torres go is a strange one for me, end of the season no issue, but half way through a season you don't weaken a squad, however good our squad is.
Not sure when Fifa's agent ruling comes into play, Riaola getting his grubby mits on serious cash will help any deal.I agree.
Back to your question, I think up to say £25m, I can't imagine Dortmund would accept that as premium in January. Over £30m, might begin to feel worth it, at the risk of not securing top4.
(and yes gus, I know you are already typing up your definitive Dortmund are guaranteed top4 this season, jusy remember how many times and how confidently you expected them Not to make top4 last year and I kept expecting them to squeeze in there, when they were hovering around 7th. They will know there is a risk and be professional about it, would be irresponsible otherwise).
Would we offer £30m+, as well as negotiating energy on Dortmund, for a player we might feel we can land for that much less and with no hassle from his club at least by simply paying a release clause? That could pretty much pay up his agent's and dad's bonuses.
I don't really think so. Pre torres sale, I would have felt almost certain. Now, I highly doubt it. I don't see how a January move really suits anyone, unfortunately.
Ages? 6 weeks and about to returnWell I guess he had been injured for ages anyway and they assume our coach will just Pep his way out of it.
Not sure when Fifa's agent ruling comes into play, Riaola getting his grubby mits on serious cash will help any deal.
I hope you are right, but I don’t think we will sign anyone in January.Ages? 6 weeks and about to return
We have lost Rodri and Jesus and possibly Walker, who knows how long for.
Mahrez off to the Arfican nations , as said you don't weaken when chasing trophies unless we are skint ;) or have something lined up.
I want and think there is a good chance to get Haaland. That said Its easy to think Haaland will score 30 so suddenly the team will score 30 more goals, we wouldn’t as others wouls score less.I hope Haaland isn't wasting our time.
If he want to join City then I am sure Khaldoon will bring him, if not and he see City as his plan B or C then just move to the next target.
I think striker role is over rated anyway, City don't have striker yet no club scored more goals in England so far this season than City.
Most goals in Europe so far :
50 goals for City & Liverpool
41 goals for Real Madrid
49 goals for Inter
56 goals for Bayern Munich
39 goals for Paris
I get the feeling Tixki is busy, time will tell.I hope you are right, but I don’t think we will sign anyone in January.
We have lost Rodri and Jesus
Is he my Christmas presentI’ve just been sent this by one of my mates who got a flight back from Norway to Manchester today, we aren’t sure if it’s Haaland or not, anyone got any ideas? If real the bags and shoes are worth a fortune on their own View attachment 32787
It just feels like he is coming and that all parties are doing everything to hide the fact. The question is does anything happen in January? Transfer? Precontract deal?A real pic of him at a real airport. Not doing much for me.
Pep saying no striker in January to me is just to stop getting the questions. Likely won't be easy or even possible to get this over the line and no one wants questions all month long. But my money is we're in negotiations right now and we've been in contact for quite some time.
I do think he ends up at City in January. Barca/ Madrid, La Liga only is a load of it... He's been on record many times saying how much he likes the EPL. His house is also in Marbella, Spain. On the coast. Don't think he's planning on commuting from there to Madrid every day.
Hard to imagine Torres sold, Mahrez off to African cup and us not bringing in another body. We're too ambitious.
The Haaland looked-to-be goodbyes. He's a massive City fan. To me, this is as much of a nailed-on thing as Mbappe is to Madrid. Only thing that could mess it up is Raiola.
I definitely agree but this is “easily” handled by him speaking to Pep or a new extension. I say this because talks of fucking Rogers being a potential replacement, on the other hand, don’t helpSomething that I think is a bit sobering is to think of City as a proposition for Haaland without Pep. We are still competitive but the dominance of recent years is down in large part to his leadership.
Being close to the club we know how well run it is but from the perspective of an outsider I think it'll be harder to tell. Every club pitching to the Haaland camp will be talking up their grand plans and how well run they are.
I don't think this is a decisive factor but it's something to bear in mind for posters saying that if he wants to win trophies it just has to be City. They'll be looking at their chances over a 4-5 year window. Signing for City it looks unlikely that Pep is there for that whole time. Personally I reckon he'll stay longer than his current contract but right now there's only another 18 months in writing.
It is a good point however I would like to think that City can show Haaland that even if Pep left hes not going to get replaced by someone like Tim Sherwood. We would be bringing in another world class coach. If we signed Haaland I would be floored if Pep still walked at the end of his contract.Something that I think is a bit sobering is to think of City as a proposition for Haaland without Pep. We are still competitive but the dominance of recent years is down in large part to his leadership.
Being close to the club we know how well run it is but from the perspective of an outsider I think it'll be harder to tell. Every club pitching to the Haaland camp will be talking up their grand plans and how well run they are.
I don't think this is a decisive factor but it's something to bear in mind for posters saying that if he wants to win trophies it just has to be City. They'll be looking at their chances over a 4-5 year window. Signing for City it looks unlikely that Pep is there for that whole time. Personally I reckon he'll stay longer than his current contract but right now there's only another 18 months in writing.
I once heard a debate on the radio about constitutes a big club, you know one of those debates with no answer. Everyone is thinking what makes their club a big club when giving their answer or what makes the rags and dippers big clubs. Money? Can’t be because city have money? Trophies? Can’t be because city have trophies? Records? Can’t be because city have records? Fans? Can’t be fans because City have higher attendances than Liverpool. Then one rag pipes up “profile”, you know that unquantifiable word they can paint themselves in.Don't forget that ANY super star in the world HAS to be connected to united. It's an unwritten law in the media that united are still big, relevent and can attract anyone and everyone.
In reality they're fucking shit and if he really is entertaining an offer from them I can guarantee it'd be for an amount of money that is incomprehensible to us