Etihad Campus, Stadium and Collar Site Development Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PQgL0ZvmnU&feature=share&list=UUkzCjdRMrW2vXLx8mvPVLdQ[/video]
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

this is excellent, shame we cant remove the scoreboards from the corners and relocate middle top roof behind goals, does anyone know if this can be done
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?
I will give you a clue
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7duPNQCp-w4[/video]
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

is it still not the case we need the gaps for air flow to ensure the pitch can grow?
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

toffee balls said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?
I will give you a clue
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7duPNQCp-w4[/video]
What, we're intending on growing holly tree's in the corners? Well that'll set us apart...... :-)

blueinsa said:
is it still not the case we need the gaps for air flow to ensure the pitch can grow?

I've seen other stadiums have even seating levels, I always wondered why we never did it as surely other stadiums will suffer from the same issues as we do..

Bernabeu+Stadium+covered+with+a+roof.jpg
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

fbloke said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

Perhaps the later phases where the other stands are expanded for an 80K + stadium will sort that out?
In all seriousness I heard this mentioned as far back as before the stadium was built. Didn't the original plans have an 80,000 all seater stadium with a retractable roof, but the government didn't want to use public funds to build such a big stadium outside of London especially as the rebuilding of Wembley was already being planned?

IIRC, the architects revised the plans downwards, but did it in such a way that the stadium could still be reverted back to the original submission with the retractable roof.
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

ManCityX said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...

2018!
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

ManCityX said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...
I love playing real world Monopoly (with Sheik Mansour's dough though) :-)

In terms of slopes, the far ends of our 2 main stands taper off whereby I thought it would look nicer and give us a bigger capacity if the highest point was continued right around all the seating.

colin_bell_and_north_stands_etihad_stadium.jpg
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

Dribble said:
fbloke said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

Perhaps the later phases where the other stands are expanded for an 80K + stadium will sort that out?
In all seriousness I heard this mentioned as far back as before the stadium was built. Didn't the original plans have an 80,000 all seater stadium with a retractable roof, but the government didn't want to use public funds to build such a big stadium outside of London especially as the rebuilding of Wembley was already being planned?

IIRC, the architects revised the plans downwards, but did it in such a way that the stadium could still be reverted back to the original submission with the retractable roof.

The 80K stadium was the Olympic one different design although similar To extend the sides would probably require a new roof There might be sme opostunity to extend the some of the upper rows withut too much trouble
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

That's something that will be sorted in the future according the design doc. The slightly circular shape of the tier will remain but it will be a lot bigger. Similar to the new South tier.

According to the doc, the options are to either demolish the current third tier and rebuild or stitch extra rows onto the existing section.
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

ManCityX said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...

About time the moan moan brigade were taken to task. Gene Kelly / dog shite alleys / stinking bogs / the guy who stood with the "sinners repent" banner / Peter Swales / loads more reasons to be unhappy if you want.
71 years old these are the best years I have had following City, oh and don't forget never boo a Blue.
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

dawlish dave said:
ManCityX said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...

About time the moan moan brigade were taken to task. Gene Kelly / dog shite alleys / stinking bogs / the guy who stood with the "sinners repent" banner / Peter Swales / loads more reasons to be unhappy if you want.
71 years old these are the best years I have had following City, oh and don't forget never boo a Blue.
well said Dave 100% correct
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

ManCityX said:
That's something that will be sorted in the future according the design doc. The slightly circular shape of the tier will remain but it will be a lot bigger. Similar to the new South tier.

According to the doc, the options are to either demolish the current third tier and rebuild or stitch extra rows onto the existing section.
So I'm 'eventually' going to get my a symmetrical stadium then? Still don't see why they don't help my OCD settle down by doing it all in this faze. We're great a building businesses and football clubs, but rubbish at time & motion efficiency unless I'm still missing summat.

Also I wish they'd draw the design doc in crayon so the average dude can understand it too!! :-)
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

I honestly can't believe any City fan would moan about this.
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

dawlish dave said:
ManCityX said:
Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

You absolute miserable sod. We're getting the best expansion money can buy and you're having a winge. Talk about spoilt rotten ;)

Props for your opinion that filling in the corners would give us a bigger capacity though. You should have been a designer! No idea what you're on about regarding the slopes either tbh.

Anyway, according to the design doc, the corners are temporary and are designed to be removed/amended once construction starts on the East and CB stands. Probably in the 2020s...

About time the moan moan brigade were taken to task. Gene Kelly / dog shite alleys / stinking bogs / the guy who stood with the "sinners repent" banner / Peter Swales / loads more reasons to be unhappy if you want.
71 years old these are the best years I have had following City, oh and don't forget never boo a Blue.
I think you missed the :)
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

Dribble said:
It might be an engineering issue, but I don't get why we didn't just go for a symmetrical joining of the seating which would give us a bigger capacity and look better IMO.

There's still gaps between the stands and the top level of seating still slopes down either side. Surely this expansion would have been the ideal opportunity to do this?

Personally I like the look of it being a specific stand rather than a wrap around like Emirates or Wembley, when we do the North Stand the ground will look fantastic with four clearly defined stands.
 
Re: Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site (cont

FantasyIreland said:
jrb said:
I honestly can't believe any City fan would moan about this.

You aint had the previous pleasure of Drivel then.
Two things:

1. It wasn't a moan, it was just an observational comment on my personal preference. If you read the corresponding posts, by all accounts the club are looking to address my observations either in 2018 or into the 2020's. I just further commented 'wouldn't it make sense just to do it all now'?

2. In respect to you - Empty vessels & all that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top