The photo is from this article https://www.building.co.uk/news/in-...xt-to-manchester-city-stadium/5104598.article
FWIW:
I asked one of the guys there about the abandoned train lines and if there was any plan to use them and he said that 'they aren't easy to get backup running' and that in terms of transport they are going to concentrate on the here and now and what they can do with current and new technology. I said the traffic can be bad but they seem to think that it is an ok place in Manchester to get to and if the etihad can cope with 55k then this will be able to cope with half as much - not sure what or if there are plans for matches at the etihad and events here clashing!
Looks nice.The photo is from this article https://www.building.co.uk/news/in-...xt-to-manchester-city-stadium/5104598.article
Public transport is a huge priority in London and mayors and MP's get elected off the back of their transport policies - and they deliver on them. Because London's public transport is properly funded.Public transport is absolutely crucial. Yes, in absolute terms it's not that far from the Etihad to Piccadilly. It certainly isn't the Pennine Way. But when it's pissing with rain (has been known in Manchester) when it's dark (seedy area at best) and when you're old/knackered/rushing to get the last bus (or last bus for an hour) it's a long way and it's off-putting.
Baffles me why effective and efficient public transport is such a low priority in this country. Politicians seem to think if they hum a tune and mention bikes occasionally the problem will go away. It won't, and it has a hobbling effect on the entire economy as people say stuff it and stay at home instead of going out and generating profits for the leisure industry.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50592261Public transport is a huge priority in London and mayors and MP's get elected off the back of their transport policies - and they deliver on them. Because London's public transport is properly funded.
Manchester gets a 5th of the funding London does per head for public transport.
It's only a low priority here because the government don't give two shits about funding it properly.
Thanks for the feedback. What the guy told you is consistent with the statements they have put into the press - they think the existing infrastructure can cope (or, if it doesn't, then I guess they probably privately think that visitor behaviour will over time simply adjust to the new realities)
Incidentally, the rails next to the stadium aren't abandoned, they are intact and still used by freight and empty passenger trains returning to depot. For the past few years there has also been a weekly TransPennine train using these rails on the Manchester Airport-Scarborough service during the May-November period. This short video shows the view from the driver's cab on this stretch.
They have one at old toilet only used for matches.
I believe the service to MUFG station was suspended in May 2018 and hasn't resumed.
There aren't many other stations in the UK that primarily exist to serve sports stadia, One that springs to mind is Bordesley station in Birmingham, close to St Andrews, which doesn't open apart from matchdays.
I've already started to wonder if the naming rights to the Arena might be linked to a site-wide sponsorship of the campus. Could the Arena also have hospitality packages for our matches etc. Interesting having it so close.
Etihad Arena.
I believe the service to MUFG station was suspended in May 2018 and hasn't resumed.
There aren't many other stations in the UK that primarily exist to serve sports stadia, One that springs to mind is Bordesley station in Birmingham, close to St Andrews, which doesn't open apart from matchdays.
I think we'd be wise (if there's a possibility) to get a giant organisation/brand for the whole campus... Amazon?!
It wouldn't just be serving the ground though. If we want the campus to be a destination then it needs access links in line with somewhere like Meadowhall.