Etihad Campus, Stadium and Collar Site Development Thread

That’s fair enough, but I don’t think our owners think like that. I’m sure they’d be only too happy to have the Etihad host the CL final.

Neither would Etihad, MCC, owners of hotels, bars, pubs, restaurants, taxi drivers, etc.

As long as either Rangers or Celtic never get to the CL final at the Etihad.

For CL games I’m sure the tv media can’t use the words The Etihad and have to refer it as the City of Manchester stadium.
UEFA regs probably.
 
I’m sure both Hotels at Stamford Bridge, one attached to the stadium, have never made an operating profit?(stand corrected on that, but read it somewhere)

They were both going to be demolished as part of the Stamford Bridge redevelopment before that was abandoned after Roman had to sell Chelsea.

6CA42ADE-215B-45E7-866E-7CB82607A3A8.jpeg

9D3D5335-EC86-41E3-8562-90190654CC80.jpeg

513BF13A-A364-42EA-B649-3CD5AF37BE67.jpeg
 
For CL games I’m sure the tv media can’t use the words The Etihad and have to refer it as the City of Manchester stadium.
UEFA regs probably.

Yes that’s correct. Only CL sponsors are allowed to be advertised.
 
I’m sure both Hotels at Stamford Bridge, one attached to the stadium, have never made an operating profit?(stand corrected on that, but read it somewhere)

They were both going to be demolished as part of the Stamford Bridge redevelopment before that was abandoned after Roman had to sell Chelsea.

View attachment 59879

View attachment 59881

View attachment 59882

I assume the hotel at LCCC is making money as they’re doubling it’s size. City need to do something similar and make the Etihad campus a viable hotel location for people visiting Manchester as well as those at concerts etc.
 
I’m sure both Hotels at Stamford Bridge, one attached to the stadium, have never made an operating profit?(stand corrected on that, but read it somewhere)

They were both going to be demolished as part of the Stamford Bridge redevelopment before that was abandoned after Roman had to sell Chelsea.

View attachment 59879

View attachment 59881

View attachment 59882
As a football only hotel perhaps 2 viable hotels are optomistic but I get the feeling that our a combined Etihad extension and a separate hotel to service the football on match days and a more regular Coop venue is planned at some stage.
 
For CL games I’m sure the tv media can’t use the words The Etihad and have to refer it as the City of Manchester stadium.
UEFA regs probably.
I only just noticed last night that the club have to scramble the white & blue seats around in the north and south stands to hide the word Etihad and the Puma logo for CL games. What a palaver.
 
I assume the hotel at LCCC is making money as they’re doubling it’s size. City need to do something similar and make the Etihad campus a viable hotel location for people visiting Manchester as well as those at concerts etc.
Hotel Football, opposite the Swamp, owned by Neville & Co made a loss.

It has been revealed that Hotel Football, the hospitality group owned by former Manchester United stars Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville, has lost £3.2 million over the last two years and owes more than £10 million in loans.

Annual accounts for the business, which were filed last week(September), show that the hotel has suffered financially due to the impact of the Covid pandemic and the subsequent national lockdowns.

The documents also revealed that the firm’s parent company, Orchid Leisure Ltd, had loaned the hotel business £10.2 million to ensure its survival.

Neville said that financial figures for 2022 have been “very encouraging”.

He added: “Based on the above the directors are confident that the company will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for at least the next 12 months.’’


I’d like to see a mixed use Hotel/apartment tower, including a viewing lounge/bar built close to the stadium, preferably on the Collar Site.

The Hotel would be busy. The apartments would sell. (football, music & events, Asda ;-), tram stop into the city centre, etc) I’d certainly use the lounge/bar if it was similar to Cloud 23(Beetham tower) and 20 stories.(No1 Spinningfield), just for the views.
 
Last edited:
I assume the hotel at LCCC is making money as they’re doubling it’s size. City need to do something similar and make the Etihad campus a viable hotel location for people visiting Manchester as well as those at concerts etc.

MCFC and the Council formed a joint venture company in 2012 to develop land in the vicinity of the stadium, and back then (in fact, even before then), MCC was proclaiming its intention to work with the club to make the Campus a 24/7 destination. This included the creation of a "visitor attraction of international significance" on the Collar Site.

There are valid reasons why the Collar Site remains undeveloped all these years later, but as @jrb posted recently, it's nonetheless rather disappointing for those of us who took a strong interest in this project from the beginning. I was one, having at that time two pretty good contacts (one inside the club and one a professional adviser) who were providing very exciting snippets of information regarding what might happen. Both have long since moved on, incidentally, so I'm now in the dark rather than receiving news of encouraging prospects that never come to pass.

The arena isn't strictly on the Collar Site and I don't think it's what was originally meant as the "attraction of international significance" that was trailed out the outset. It will, however, attract additional numbers of visitors to the Campus numbering a couple of million or more annually, so hopefully will stimulate further development - hotel accommodation together with mixed use retail and leisure outlets offer an obvious synergy, and - who knows? - perhaps they might finally bring forth the stellar attraction that was originally being spoken of.
 
I assume the hotel at LCCC is making money as they’re doubling it’s size. City need to do something similar and make the Etihad campus a viable hotel location for people visiting Manchester as well as those at concerts etc.
I’d have thought most people would rather stay in Manchester apart from a convenience point of view.
 
Hotel Football, opposite the Swamp, owned by Neville & Co made a loss.

It has been revealed that Hotel Football, the hospitality group owned by former Manchester United stars Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville, has lost £3.2 million over the last two years and owes more than £10 million in loans.

Annual accounts for the business, which were filed last week(September), show that the hotel has suffered financially due to the impact of the Covid pandemic and the subsequent national lockdowns.

The documents also revealed that the firm’s parent company, Orchid Leisure Ltd, had loaned the hotel business £10.2 million to ensure its survival.

Neville said that financial figures for 2022 have been “very encouraging”.

He added: “Based on the above the directors are confident that the company will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for at least the next 12 months.’’


I’d like to see a mixed use Hotel/apartment tower, including a viewing lounge/bar built close to the stadium, preferably on the Collar Site.

The Hotel would be busy. The apartments would sell. (football, music & events, Asda ;-), tram stop into the city centre, etc) I’d certainly use the lounge/bar if it was similar to Cloud 23(Beetham tower) and 20 stories.(No1 Spinningfield), just for the views.
That was due to covid surely
 
Hotel Football, opposite the Swamp, owned by Neville & Co made a loss.

It has been revealed that Hotel Football, the hospitality group owned by former Manchester United stars Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville, has lost £3.2 million over the last two years and owes more than £10 million in loans.

Annual accounts for the business, which were filed last week, show that the hotel has suffered financially due to the impact of the Covid pandemic and the subsequent national lockdowns.

The documents also revealed that the firm’s parent company, Orchid Leisure Ltd, had loaned the hotel business £10.2 million to ensure its survival.

Neville said that financial figures for 2022 have been “very encouraging”.

He added: “Based on the above the directors are confident that the company will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for at least the next 12 months.’’


I’d like to see a mixed use Hotel/apartment tower, including a viewing lounge/bar built close to the stadium, preferably on the Collar Site.

The Hotel would be busy. The apartments would sell. (football, music & events, Asda ;-), tram stop into the city centre, etc) I’d certainly use the lounge/bar if it was similar to Cloud 23(Beetham tower) and 20 stories.(No1 Spinningfield), just for the views.

I think that's just due to the timing more than anything. Covid will have killed the revenues. Even with the arena though you're looking at 2-3 events a week and it's not a 24/7 destination. Any hotel should provide a state-of-the-art conference/convention centre so it attracts big businesses to come and use the facilities. They can stay in the hotel and they can go corporate to the football games. Arsenal and Spurs will have loads of boxes sold on company credit cards for entertaining. There's more going on near the swamp with Salford Quays there and the cricket ground - with a very good hotel that probably sells out first. And there's a lot of tourists at the swamp which we know. To attract more revenue at the football you need to try and attract more businesses with the big company money out to that part of Manchester and that's one way that could do it.
 
Asking the question.

Bar possible issues with the roof, which can be overcome, see below, is there any reason why City and their architects can’t retain level 1, keep it open, and build from the back of Level 1 after removing(demolishing level 2), and create a single tier similar to the one at Spurs?

I appreciate people are saying a single tier isn’t happening, but it could be done, couldn’t it?

Note: What looks like level one across the bottom levels, just infront of the entrnces/exits, seamlessly expands into the upper levels.

A2-E1-C5-B6-1811-43-E1-B10-D-5-F5-FF4-F903-BC.jpg


The side stand, level - 3, ends like the ES and CBS - level 3, but at a different angle.

1667473807867.jpeg


Regardless of what City decide to do, the roof will have to be removed, realigned, and put back, just like it was when the SS was expanded.

Click on the link for more pictures and details.

Steelwork contractor Severfield supplied, fabricated, and installed 4,000t of structural steelwork for the job.

We also dismantled the existing roof, carried out all temporary works and designed connections,” explains Severfield Project Manager Paul Hulme.

1667473193586.jpeg

1667473231615.jpeg

 
Last edited:
Hotel Football, opposite the Swamp, owned by Neville & Co made a loss.

It has been revealed that Hotel Football, the hospitality group owned by former Manchester United stars Ryan Giggs and Gary Neville, has lost £3.2 million over the last two years and owes more than £10 million in loans.

Annual accounts for the business, which were filed last week(September), show that the hotel has suffered financially due to the impact of the Covid pandemic and the subsequent national lockdowns.

The documents also revealed that the firm’s parent company, Orchid Leisure Ltd, had loaned the hotel business £10.2 million to ensure its survival.

Neville said that financial figures for 2022 have been “very encouraging”.

He added: “Based on the above the directors are confident that the company will have sufficient funds to meet its liabilities as they fall due for at least the next 12 months.’’


I’d like to see a mixed use Hotel/apartment tower, including a viewing lounge/bar built close to the stadium, preferably on the Collar Site.

The Hotel would be busy. The apartments would sell. (football, music & events, Asda ;-), tram stop into the city centre, etc) I’d certainly use the lounge/bar if it was similar to Cloud 23(Beetham tower) and 20 stories.(No1 Spinningfield), just for the views.
We need a hotel regulator, to save hotels and be run by the government!!
 
1667472360129.png
Should the club not build the hotel here where the proposed super casino was to go, this building could house lots of different facilities including a hotels, club shop,club offices, bar resurant and other lesure facilities that would attract footfall during the day.

The reason for suggestion this is the hotel would five minute walk from the arena

Here is Spurs the shop just now , you fit something like that into the lower level of the super casino building above

1667472923369.png

Here is the Hydro in Glasgow its surrounded by hotels,Radisson Red with Sky Bar,The Village Hotel Spa & Gym, Hilton Garden,Premier Inn and the Crowne Plaza a different hotel covering different costs.

The new COOP Live arena is to be the biggest in the UK so you are going to need hotels so buiding a building simlar to the super casino building would help massively a hotel on the former gas holder site is no brainer as well

1667473179004.png
 
Asking the question.

Bar possible issues with the roof, which could probably be overcome, is there any reason why City and their architects can’t retain level 1, keep it open, and build from the back of Level 1 after removing(demolishing level 2), and creating a single tier similar to the one at Spurs?

I appreciate people are saying a single tier isn’t happening, but it could be done, couldn’t it?

Note: What looks like level one across the bottom levels, just infront of the entrnces/exits, seamlessly expands into the upper levels.

A2-E1-C5-B6-1811-43-E1-B10-D-5-F5-FF4-F903-BC.jpg


Regardless of what City decide to do, the roof will have to be removed, realigned, and put back, just like it was when the SS was expanded.

Click on the link for more pictures and details.

Steelwork contractor Severfield supplied, fabricated, and installed 4,000t of structural steelwork for the job.

We also dismantled the existing roof, carried out all temporary works and designed connections,” explains Severfield Project Manager Paul Hulme.

View attachment 59891

View attachment 59892


Level 1 is too shallow to be part of a single tier. It would mean the upper section would be too steep to join up with it if it were to be of a decent enough size.

A single tier is possible but they’d have to close the stand for a year or build over two years. In the latter situation they’d build the upper section first and then construct a new steeper lower section below it in the second year.

The club would probably think it was too costly to close a stand or do it over 2 seasons when they can do either a south stand copy or 2 tier stand for cheaper and in 1 season.
 
Asking the question.

Bar possible issues with the roof, which could probably be overcome, is there any reason why City and their architects can’t retain level 1, keep it open, and build from the back of Level 1 after removing(demolishing level 2), and creating a single tier similar to the one at Spurs?

I appreciate people are saying a single tier isn’t happening, but it could be done, couldn’t it?

Note: What looks like level one across the bottom levels, just infront of the entrnces/exits, seamlessly expands into the upper levels.

A2-E1-C5-B6-1811-43-E1-B10-D-5-F5-FF4-F903-BC.jpg


The side stand, level - 3, ends like the ES and CBS - level 3.

View attachment 59895


Regardless of what City decide to do, the roof will have to be removed, realigned, and put back, just like it was when the SS was expanded.

Click on the link for more pictures and details.

Steelwork contractor Severfield supplied, fabricated, and installed 4,000t of structural steelwork for the job.

We also dismantled the existing roof, carried out all temporary works and designed connections,” explains Severfield Project Manager Paul Hulme.

View attachment 59891

View attachment 59892

Well done @jrb that is what I have been trying to say but got shouted down for suggesting it
 
Level 1 is too shallow to be part of a single tier. It would mean the upper section would be too steep to join up with it if it were to be of a decent enough size.

A single tier is possible but they’d have to close the stand for a year or build over two years. In the latter situation they’d build the upper section first and then construct a new steeper lower section below it in the second year.

The club would probably think it was too costly to close a stand or do it over 2 seasons when they can to either a south stand copy or 2 tier stand for cheaper and in 1 season.
Could they not build the expanded 2nd tier with the North Stand still open then when the season ends join them together then elevate the first tier?

Liverpool is doing something like this with their Anfield Road end
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top