Etihad Campus, Stadium Development and Collar Site

Status
Not open for further replies.
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I'm more of a Bridge on the River Kwai man, myself.

A hardwood superstructure with Bamboo fittings looks so seventies / eighties. Also there is no need to carry rail traffic.
 
Holcombe bloo said:
80s Shorts said:
Holcombe bloo said:
its not about the journey its the destination. shit hot academy linked by average bridge to shit hot stadium.

Yeah I know.

Its all the hype on here and the stuff in the planning app "iconic" etc etc.

I was expecting something spectacular. Maybe the purse strings are being tightened somewhat.

No point in an iconic bridge, nobody would come from far and wide to see the new mcfc pedestrian bridge over Turing way, however flash. They will however be drawn to the marvels either side. Money I suspect is not the issue, but still Khaldoon and co wont spend just for the hell of it.

I'd still of preferred a log flume though.

Maybe not iconic in relation to the san francisco bridge or anything but I thought they would make a decent enough one for it to be iconic in a metphorical sense ie for academy players to 'cross the bridge' and make it to the first team. But that bridge is just shit isn't it? To put it into perspective here's the one on the skyscraper thread at st helens:

Saints_Stadium-1.jpg


Far superior to the crap thing we've got. Obviously it's just a bridge and I'm not really arsed but it would have been a little extra to add to the campus if it was half decent, which it isn't
 
Holcombe bloo said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I'm more of a Bridge on the River Kwai man, myself.

A hardwood superstructure with Bamboo fittings looks so seventies / eighties. Also there is no need to carry rail traffic.
Fair comment. Also the working conditions of the men who built it might draw some adverse publicity.
 
Well, its what we've got now, like it or not we're stuck with it. Perhaps the club could pay a consultant such as Gok wan or Llewlyn bowen to jazz it up a bit?
 
The design challenge of making the bridge interesting let alone 'iconic' in its location was one I reckon was simply a waste of energy.

The height of any bridge had to be low enough for easy of use and the only way of making it stand out is what we got in the original drawings we all saw.

That bridge would simply have looked out of place when the collar site and other developments are done with.

And here's the bridge in question

rrv34i.png
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Holcombe bloo said:
80s Shorts said:
Yeah I know.

Its all the hype on here and the stuff in the planning app "iconic" etc etc.

I was expecting something spectacular. Maybe the purse strings are being tightened somewhat.

No point in an iconic bridge, nobody would come from far and wide to see the new mcfc pedestrian bridge over Turing way, however flash. They will however be drawn to the marvels either side. Money I suspect is not the issue, but still Khaldoon and co wont spend just for the hell of it.

I'd still of preferred a log flume though.

Maybe not iconic in relation to the san francisco bridge or anything but I thought they would make a decent enough one for it to be iconic in a metphorical sense ie for academy players to 'cross the bridge' and make it to the first team. But that bridge is just shit isn't it? To put it into perspective here's the one on the skyscraper thread at st helens:

Saints_Stadium-1.jpg


Far superior to the crap thing we've got. Obviously it's just a bridge and I'm not really arsed but it would have been a little extra to add to the campus if it was half decent, which it isn't

With FFP lucky it doesn't look like this instead:

dangerous-rope-bridge-1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.