Len Rum
Well-Known Member
About 10bn a year.How much do we pay to be in the eu??, does everyone pay the same amount??,
We are one of the biggest contributors.
Not everyone pays the same.
Countries with the biggest economies pay more.
About 10bn a year.How much do we pay to be in the eu??, does everyone pay the same amount??,
Hate to say it long term Britain is on a continual century plus long decline as has happened to al great powers, as with all great powers a lot of countries have scores to settle and they will use an exit to do that. But Britains decline is not going to be too different in or out, it is like old age and will happen slowly and surely .Simples.
We stay in,no change, things carry on as normal,no risk.
We leave,big risk (mainly economic ,also legal), but also lots of opportunities, we could flourish outside the EU and learn more about ourselves as a country.
How much do we pay to be in the eu??, does everyone pay the same amount??,
Cameron is a conservative.
Conservatives are fundamentally averse to europe.
So why is he so desperate to stay in?
The french and german people have a different take on democracy to us, what with rent controls, 40 hour week etc. things that the tory party has opposed in every way.
I wonder, could leaving open the way to the EU passing laws that disadvantage our money men in the banking sector ( tory to a man )
Canary Wharf moving to Frankfurt? The immigrant problem could just be a smokescreen, .....whatever . Wouldn't be the first time a politician has misled the public, surely wont be the last.
Isn't £10bn the net contribution.....? A hell of a lot of money, though the money men say it's something like 0.5% or 1% of our GDP, so its nothing to worry about.... yeah right!About 10bn a year.
We are one of the biggest contributors.
Not everyone pays the same.
Countries with the biggest economies pay more.
I predict this will be the basis of Cameron's next public speech....
I promised you a referendum before the end of 2017 and I will deliver. I came to this summit hoping to secure a deal that would be the best for Britain, and whilst I achieved many of my stated objectives I don't think what was finally offered was the best deal for Britain. I also told you that I would only accept the best deal.
Therefore I will not accept what has been offered and I will return to the negotiating table to make sure we get the best for Britain. What this means is that it would not be wise for the British people to vote in a referendum in June but for us to come back to the negotiating table and secure a better, the best deal for Britain. I promised you we'd have a referendum by the end of 2017 and I also promised I'd get the best deal for Britain and I intend to deliver on both.
Which if you summarise it means "I've failed"
The tide comes in as blue moon and the country argue about whether to sit on the yellow or purple thrones and whose fault it is that the tide keeps rolling in. If it didn't point to just how deluded the press and much of the country is and just how naive the blame game has become it would be funny!Ultimately, the outcome of a domestic referendum has as much influence on human progress as King Canute had on tidal patterns.
10 billion won't go along way to potential losses in trade deals or replacing all the new civil service and infrastructure to deal with the 1000's of new treaties and agreement s and enforcing them. The U.K. Could blow this amount in one crappy millitary dealIsn't £10bn the net contribution.....? A hell of a lot of money, though the money men say it's something like 0.5% or 1% of our GDP, so its nothing to worry about.... yeah right!