So much for the European Super League speculation.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35888818
More knockout rounds early on followed by 2 leagues of 8 teams (14 games in total) rather than the present 8 groups of 4 which is generally a snorefest as you can pretty much predict the results.
Personally I think restricting the group stage to the top 16 teams in Europe will be a good thing.
Of course give all the teams the opportity to get there, it shouldn't be a closed shop. But there should be a knock out stage before the groups, with the losers going in to the Europa.
The bit I disagree with is the format after that. Two leagues of 8 with the top two of each going to a semi final would be boring. If only the top 2 progress, the last 5 or 6 games would become irrelevant to the bottom 4 or 5 clubs, they'd just put out second string teams, and no fans or TV viewers are going to be arsed about watching dead rubbers.
A better way would be to keep the group format, but have no seedings. So 4 groups of 4, top 2 teams go through to the quarters. Yes it's less games, but every game would matter, every gamd would be between 2 top sides which is what the advertisers and the clubs want. But you wouldn't get a load of meaningless and boring games.
I've always thought the European Championships is a higher standard at the group stage than the world cup. Because it only has 16 teams instead of 32, every match matters. Every team can realistically get out of the group. The world cup group stage of 32 is usually pretty boring. UEFA in their wisdom have expanded it this year, and the quality of the tournament will suffer.