Everton (a) post-match thread

Alan Harper's Tash said:
Bizarre that he removed his pictures given they “proved him right"
Click to expand...
I have already posted them twice before. I just thought 3 times would be overkill and I also told you the cut off the grass wasn't as visible on mine. Someone posted one with the lines visible which shows it better also(so mine aren't needed). Don't let that get away of your false narrative though.
 
Metalartin said:
I have already posted them twice before. I just thought 3 times would be overkill and I also told you the cut off the grass wasn't as visible on mine. Someone posted one with the lines visible which shows it better(so mine aren't needed). Don't let that get away of you're false narrative though.
Click to expand...
Have you thought about being a linesman?

Your eyesight is better than theirs and you’re looking from an angle.
 
SWPISHOME said:
Ha ha you have the audacity to tell people to grow up! Stop going in editing your post too fixing them all up pretending to be mr niceguy :)
Click to expand...
Haha, what did I edit out that was so bad? I edit most of my posts if I see a better way of explaining something or a typo. I think you're grasping at straws there anyway.

You're the one claiming not to care while using emotive language and swearing.

It wasn't even me who started the "more people agree with me" argument btw it was your friend Alan. I was just pointing out it wasn't a good argument to make from his point of view.
 
Last edited:
Metalartin said:
Haha, what did I edit out that was so bad? I edit most of my posts if I see a better way of explaining something or a typo. I think you're grasping at straws there anyway.

You're the one claiming not to care while using emotive language and swearing.

It wasn't even me who started the "more people agree with me" argument btw it was your friend Alan. I was just pointing out it wasn't a good argument to make from his point of view.
Click to expand...
Your the one who started your smart comments with your "Oh you heard what he said did you?" Nonsense.
For some reason your taking it personal for saying I think Dias "could" be playing Richarlison onside. I also said I couldn't give a bollocks if he was on it off because it doesn't matter we won the game. I don't know why your taking offence to that, Only you know why.

Anyway we'll leave it at that because it's the most pointless argument to be having...Enjoy your night.
 
Does anyone have the NBC picture to clear it up? Saves me having to mess about in photoshop, only for someone to dismiss it.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
No one has proven it either way, however sure you are.
Click to expand...
He's off friend...not by much, but by today's merciless VAR standards its not a debate...EPL has NOT said he was on...they said there was no need to check so they didn't...if Everton were so sure he was on they have the means to apply their own "VAR" to the footage but that would kill the uproar...City isn't going to do that and show up the league who ruled in their favor on the handball...they have absolutely no need to...and the media full of ex-Red pundits sure won't do it...so here we are...the game is over, 3 pts. in the bag...we struggled mightily to score one goal...they didn't do a fucking thing all day but sit in a low block so I don't want to hear they deserved better...every time City win a close game someone else deserves better...nonsense...let Everton PROVE he was not off and then we can get back to the handball debate...otherwise why should we give a fuck?
 
JewelZee said:
He's off friend...not by much, but by today's merciless VAR standards its not a debate...EPL has NOT said he was on...they said there was no need to check so they didn't...if Everton were so sure he was on they have the means to apply their own "VAR" to the footage but that would kill the uproar...City isn't going to do that and show up the league who ruled in their favor on the handball...they have absolutely no need to...and the media full of ex-Red pundits sure won't do it...so here we are...the game is over, 3 pts. in the bag...we struggled mightily to score one goal...they didn't do a fucking thing all day but sit in a low block so I don't want to hear they deserved better...every time City win a close game someone else deserves better...nonsense...let Everton PROVE he was not off and then we can get back to the handball debate...otherwise why should we give a fuck?
Click to expand...
No one has posted any conclusive proof of it though. If they do, I’m happy to say I was wrong in thinking that it’s a tight offside call with Dias!

It doesn’t even matter as it wasn’t handball.

Apparently!
 
SWPISHOME said:
Your the one who started your smart comments with your "Oh you heard what he said did you?" Nonsense.
For some reason your taking it personal for saying I think Dias "could" be playing Richarlison onside. I also said I couldn't give a bollocks if he was on it off because it doesn't matter we won the game. I don't know why your taking offence to that, Only you know why.

Anyway we'll leave it at that because it's the most pointless argument to be having...Enjoy your night.
Click to expand...
The Lampard quote just confuses matters, the ref wouldn't have known about the offside unless VAR checked it. There's been no indication that they did and we shouldn't take that as one on it's own.

I had grown tired of explaining why Lampard's take isn't proof of anything, to the many outraged Liverpool fans on skys youtube videos. No fault of yours granted, which is why I removed it but I do think you overacted a tad(sarcastic at worst, not comment worthy, especially on BM). All I was doing was asking you to acknowledge we only have Lampard's word on that and he could have misheard it/heard what he wanted to because he was angry. I only removed it because I didn't want the conversation to turn into what it did but I'm not really sure it would have made much of a difference had you not seen it personally.

You're free to have your view but it really seemed like some of you were trying to have the final say on it, which was grating. Anyway, you're right it's pointless, far too much written about who's fault it is we're arguing. Lets just move on.
 
Last edited:
Alan Harper's Tash said:
No one has posted any conclusive proof of it though. If they do, I’m happy to say I was wrong in thinking that it’s a tight offside call with Dias!

It doesn’t even matter as it wasn’t handball.

Apparently!
Click to expand...
I understand your point...it is very tight...but Everton asking for an apology from the league is a bit ridiculous...I'm just saying if they feel so aggrieved why don't they produce the evidence of Richarlison being on so they can hang their case on what they feel is a missed handball call...Or have they looked hard and know he was offside...so why would they say anything and kill their opportunity to whine...We got the call, one way or another so there's no need for City to do or say anything...in order for it to have ever come to an actual pen Richarlison would have had to be cleared by a VAR review if a hand ball had been given...
And btw, Lampard is a fucking liar...no ref told him it was on...they told him offside wasn't a factor in the decision...and it wasn't...those are two entirely different things...
 

Attachments

  • A373A7D1-5E48-4207-99A4-0653E1CFFF83.jpeg
    A373A7D1-5E48-4207-99A4-0653E1CFFF83.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 61
By pure chance, I found a link to a tweet which has the NBC offside line, on the MEN article, which is wrongly headlined: "Pep Guardiola admits Rodri handball should have been a penalty for Everton"

RicharlisonNBC-offside-line.jpg
Looks off to me(knee, shoulder and head) but not by as much as I first thought. I'm not quite happy with where they put the line but I think it still shows who's body parts(the relevant ones) are more ahead of who's. I might have a go at my own tomorrow but to be honest I really can't be bothered right now. That's satisfied me, for my part.
 
Last edited:
york away to this! said:
So the sleeve thing? Like goal-line tech, does the whole of the ball need to be below, or above, the "line"? The centre of the ball? I'm sure this has already been discussed, though can't be arsed scrolling through the whole thread...
Click to expand...
No point. There's no official answer. VAR has come up with "more in the green zone than the red zone" but there's nothing in the laws to justify that as a rule.
 
Vic said:
No point. There's no official answer. VAR has come up with "more in the green zone than the red zone" but there's nothing in the laws to justify that as a rule.
Click to expand...
It looked like a penalty and if it was the other way and not given for us we would be gutted
Anyway we won and it can’t be changed Everton fans upset Fine by me
Liverpool fans upset even better
 
Scouse Blue said:
We've lost a point because of a professional who cannot do his job right. It is so incompetent to get it wrong," said Lampard... Presumably if it had been awarded then we would have not been allowed to have Ederson to face it.... Fooking knobhead!
Click to expand...
Of course, if the professionals called Richarlison and Keane had done their jobs properly, they probably wouldn’t have needed a penalty……
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top