If anyone asks the club for an exclusive interview (with a player for example) they are told that the price of that is a positive piece about what we're doing in the community or for East Manchester. Most aren't interested which is why you see so few genuine City exclusives. No PR person, however good, can force a paper to carry a positive story or to withdraw a negative one, unless it's legally actionable. And at the moment, the numbers of clicks for negative City stories are generally higher that those for positive stories. And at most of the red-tops, journalists are judged by the number of clicks they attract so if they've a choice between a story that paints us in a good light that might only get 1m hits or one that paints us in a negative light, which gets 10m hits, which one do you think they'll go for?
How do you suggest we stop that? Because banning people won't stop that, unless you're someone like the rags where you can actually hurt that paper or journalist by banning them. We can't do that and there's no point in thinking that we can.