If the **** was any more obvious he'd be hanging out of the back of his sister in law.
Ha :)
If the **** was any more obvious he'd be hanging out of the back of his sister in law.
Some good shouts there S.My favourite was Tommy Hutchison as he could play either wing and still cross a decent ball with his "wrong" foot.
This was my bitch as soon as I got back B and its from page 34 :This from Proy......which I agree with
QUOTE:
4 or 5 times Sterling had the ball at the by line. I play the game non professionally and have done for a number of years. That doesn't make me an expert, but when he got there, I'm looking up. And I can't believe it. There isn't a fucking soul in the box. In fact we are all stood on the edge of it. So it goes back and then gets played around the edge of the box. It literally is like watching Arsenal. I also think it's a tactic
For a team with so much pace on either side I find it totally perplexing that we don't support the play in our box when attacking. We don't go forward in numbers.
Like you said, meat and drink to championship sides tonight. They'd have scored a fuckload.
Aye, you're right = by the strict laws of the game it was a foul therefore a pen., but there's the spirit of the game too and because he went looking for it I'm not sorry it wasn't given. Excuse me for being so Corinthian, there's still a few of us left.
Aye, you're right = by the strict laws of the game it was a foul therefore a pen., but there's the spirit of the game too and because he went looking for it I'm not sorry it wasn't given. Excuse me for being so Corinthian, there's still a few of us left.
Well for what use he was in the second half ... Big Joe.Here is a genuine question for most of you.
Would you have brought on Ihenacho? - if so -who would you have subbed?. and what formation would you have employed.?
The only players to be considered for subbing would have to be - Aguero ? - Navas ? - Sterling? - KdB (who was subbed by Silva).
Fernando needed to stay on (had a good game) . Also Pellers would not have subbed yaya. -
Ihenacho will be seeking to leave in the summer - I would guess.
Here is a genuine question for most of you.
Would you have brought on Ihenacho? - if so -who would you have subbed?. and what formation would you have employed.?
The only players to be considered for subbing would have to be - Aguero ? - Navas ? - Sterling? - KdB (who was subbed by Silva).
Fernando needed to stay on (had a good game) . Also Pellers would not have subbed yaya. -
Ihenacho will be seeking to leave in the summer - I would guess.
Here is a genuine question for most of you.
Would you have brought on Ihenacho? - if so -who would you have subbed?. and what formation would you have employed.?
The only players to be considered for subbing would have to be - Aguero ? - Navas ? - Sterling? - KdB (who was subbed by Silva).
Fernando needed to stay on (had a good game) . Also Pellers would not have subbed yaya. -
Ihenacho will be seeking to leave in the summer - I would guess.
Exactly this. We had to switch to 4-4-2. Our lack of strikers ( and his lack of trust in kelechi) has been so costly this season.Considering all we was doing in the second half was passing it from one wing to the other and eventually hitting in more often than not crap crosses i didn't see the point in Silva. There was no movement for him to thread a ball through to and no space for him to work. I would of brought Kelechi on for KDB and gone a legitimate 4-4-2 we were playing that way anyway just with nobody in the box.
And both teams above us win of course
Young,pissed and hornyI F YOU bored now what were you like 2 0 years ago ?