Let's not start this "it sets a precedent purely so they can do us" story. This has nothing to do with city and the premier league aren't punishing everton to make it easier to come for us it's as stupid of an argument as those comparing the two completely separate cases.
Question that needs to be asked is everton will have been fully aware they were on course to fail ffp so why did they not just look to sell somebody in the window to cover the near £20 million overspend? One sale prevents this.
Look im not sitying here and saying we have done nothing wrong but there are mitigating factors.
1. We took a huge loss on an expensive player due to a police investigation. Not the clubs fault.
2. We had sponsorship deals lined up that fell through due to the Ukraine war and sanctions.
3. We used our own money to put towards a new stadium instead of taking out a loan with interest.
I get that point 2 you could say well this can happen to anyone but nobody expected the invasion.
Unlike the FL, the PL has no guidance or rules in place for a breach of P&S. It sets a precedent as they have just made up the punishment on the spot with a note that due to a billionaire owner, only a points deduction is punishment. So if our owner wasnt a billionaire, a fine would have done it?
How can you enforce a punishment when there are no guidelines for the punishment.
Also we have been punished more than teams who go into Administration.