F1 2026

Four teams use that engine.

Merc just have a very good car, including chassis and aero.
Do Mercedes supply other teams with identical engines to what they use?

I have always wondered how that is regulated? Do they sell the exact same spec engine to the rivals as what they put in their own cars?

do Alpine and Williams have the exact same engine as the Mercedes have

Same with Ferarri supplying Hass?
 
Do Mercedes supply other teams with identical engines to what they use?

I have always wondered how that is regulated? Do they sell the exact same spec engine to the rivals as what they put in their own cars?

do Alpine and Williams have the exact same engine as the Mercedes have

Same with Ferarri supplying Hass?

Yes matey. Under the current regulations in Formula One, manufacturers must supply customer teams with power units that are identical in specification and performance to those used by their own works team.

This requirement comes from the FIA Sporting Regulations. Article 8.3 states that a power unit manufacturer must provide customer teams with power units of the same specification as those used by the works team. In other words, Merc cannot legally give its own works team a better or newer engine than the ones supplied to customer teams such as McLaren etc.

The FIA enforces this through several mechanisms. First, the power unit design must be homologated with the governing body, the FIA. Once homologated, the specification of the engine hardware is effectively frozen. They can make changes can only be made for reliability, safety or cost reasons, and any approved change must be supplied to all teams using that engine.

Second, each engine component is registered, serialised and sealed by the FIA. The internal combustion engine, turbocharger, MGU, energy store, control electronics and other components all carry identification numbers and FIA seals. If a sealed component is opened or modified without FIA approval it becomes illegal and they get penalised.

Third, all teams run a standardised ECU supplied by McLaren Applied Technologies. The FIA has full access to the engine software and telemetry. They can monitor torque demand, ignition timing, fuel flow, ERS deployment and other parameters in real time. This prevents a manufacturer from secretly giving its works team a more aggressive engine map.

Engine mode restrictions also play a role. Since the 2020 season the FIA requires a single internal combustion engine mode to be used from qualifying through the race.

In practice this means the physical engine and its allowed operating modes must be the same across all teams using that manufacturer.

It used to be the case that customer engines weren’t as good but that all changed in 2018 with technical directive TD/005-18 but it goes on for ages so I’ll let you google it if you’re interested.



Works teams can still gain an advantage through better cooling, packaging or integration of the power unit within their chassis. However, the regulations are designed so that the actual power unit specification and performance must be identical between works and customer teams.
 
Hello all. I half-follow F1 and know some bits and pieces but I'm just wondering why Mercedes in Russell and Antonelli are up there with the favourites to win the championship this year compared to the last seasons when Mercedes weren't a real threat? What's changed as McLaren go from where they were last season to now? TIA.
Massive rule changes this year. The entire sport hit a big reset button.

This happens every few years in F1 for this reason, to shake things up and keep things fresh.

The rule changes this year are particularly big, easily the biggest since the hybrid engines came in in 2014 or since DRS came in in 2009.

People talk about the drivers but you need to remember that at its heart, F1 is really an elite design and engineering competition. Think of it that way and it makes more sense. Obviously the drivers are important but it’s always been about the designers.
 
Last edited:
Far too early to be calling it a one horse race.

Countless examples of teams turning up at the first few races and looking untouchable only to drop into the pack.

There is so much learning and understanding to come on these regulations. It’ll flip all over the place.

Impressed with Audi (despite the issue at the end of Q2), really striking to put a car in the top 10 at the first time of asking with your first attempt at a power unit.

However I have to say I’m not a fan of the 50/50 power units and all the active aero / boost nonsense. I do hope in the future we see a switch to bio fuel and Formula E can have all the ‘electric tech’.
I agree.

McLaren and Red Bull will do a lot of development through the season.

McLaren went from literally the back of the grid to fighting for wins within a season’s development a few years back, they’re arguably the best on the grid at mid season evolution.
 
Hello all. I half-follow F1 and know some bits and pieces but I'm just wondering why Mercedes in Russell and Antonelli are up there with the favourites to win the championship this year compared to the last seasons when Mercedes weren't a real threat? What's changed as McLaren go from where they were last season to now? TIA.

Mercedes never mastered ground effect like Red Bull and McClaren did in the previous major rule regulation change. They’ve never really been a team that is good at working on aero and downforce.

The new regulations with a simplified engine has swung the advantage back their way. Their strength has always been building a strong engine. Their preseason has been good on the amount of running they got and data collection which has them in a good place at the moment.

Ferrari seemed to match them pace wise but their as per usual strategy fuck ups handed it to Mercedes.
 
Mercedes never mastered ground effect like Red Bull and McClaren did in the previous major rule regulation change. They’ve never really been a team that is good at working on aero and downforce.

The new regulations with a simplified engine has swung the advantage back their way. Their strength has always been building a strong engine. Their preseason has been good on the amount of running they got and data collection which has them in a good place at the moment.

Ferrari seemed to match them pace wise but their as per usual strategy fuck ups handed it to Mercedes.
I reckon Lewis's engineer is the same clown as last year but putting on a slightly different voice, maybe wearing a comedy disguise moustache while walking round the garage.
 
I suppose the only (small) advantage Mercedes have is that they can design a car and then make the engine fit within that car. The others get the engine and then have to fit the car around it.
 
I reckon Lewis's engineer is the same clown as last year but putting on a slightly different voice, maybe wearing a comedy disguise moustache while walking round the garage.
He's changed from his Mario outfit into Luigi.

It was a bizarre decision and could only have been a gamble that there was another safety car, full or virtual. They would have got it but for timing, but you'd have thought they'd have split their strategies at the time to cover Mercedes.

The good news is their car looks quick in race trim and the McLaren and Red Bull didn't look far off, so there's a chance of a decent fight if they can all close the gap quickly and then an engine rule clarification from June should close the gap further, if Mercedes had done something different than the others. Considering a couple of races could be delayed until later in the season, it could be close which is what most viewers will want
 
Gave up on F1 after the Hamilton/Verstappen safety car debacle.

I'm going to give it a couple of races this season, and see how it goes. If it's the same old shite from the teams and race officials then it can get in the bin for another season.
Followed it since James Hunt's win for McClaren in '76 but totally lost interest after THAT day in Abu Dhabi. If ever you needed proof of corruption in sport....
 
He's changed from his Mario outfit into Luigi.

It was a bizarre decision and could only have been a gamble that there was another safety car, full or virtual. They would have got it but for timing, but you'd have thought they'd have split their strategies at the time to cover Mercedes.

The good news is their car looks quick in race trim and the McLaren and Red Bull didn't look far off, so there's a chance of a decent fight if they can all close the gap quickly and then an engine rule clarification from June should close the gap further, if Mercedes had done something different than the others. Considering a couple of races could be delayed until later in the season, it could be close which is what most viewers will want
exactly, just split the strategies, they had nothing to lose. They were miles ahead of Norris anyway so you might as well pit at least one of them and see what happens.

It's literally like whoever is on the pit wall on a Sunday has been out on the piss straight before the race. They clearly know how to build a car, but have zero - ZERO - ability to manage a race or communicate.

It's like City using all of Guardiola and his team's brains to train the squad and get everyone fit but then on a match day just hand over all tactics to some random idiot dragged in from the bar at Mary D's.
 
If two races cannot go ahead I doubt they will be rescheduled.
Sure I read last week that they'd already confirmed that if some races get cancelled there's not enough time to reschedule/replace them so they'll just run the season without them.

Bahrain seems almost impossible at the moment.
 
I suppose the only (small) advantage Mercedes have is that they can design a car and then make the engine fit within that car. The others get the engine and then have to fit the car around it.
Sort of - though Mclaren basically operate as a works team too as they negotiated a special status with Mercedes - they're different to the normal customer teams, Williams etc.
 
Yes matey. Under the current regulations in Formula One, manufacturers must supply customer teams with power units that are identical in specification and performance to those used by their own works team.

This requirement comes from the FIA Sporting Regulations. Article 8.3 states that a power unit manufacturer must provide customer teams with power units of the same specification as those used by the works team. In other words, Merc cannot legally give its own works team a better or newer engine than the ones supplied to customer teams such as McLaren etc.

The FIA enforces this through several mechanisms. First, the power unit design must be homologated with the governing body, the FIA. Once homologated, the specification of the engine hardware is effectively frozen. They can make changes can only be made for reliability, safety or cost reasons, and any approved change must be supplied to all teams using that engine.

Second, each engine component is registered, serialised and sealed by the FIA. The internal combustion engine, turbocharger, MGU, energy store, control electronics and other components all carry identification numbers and FIA seals. If a sealed component is opened or modified without FIA approval it becomes illegal and they get penalised.

Third, all teams run a standardised ECU supplied by McLaren Applied Technologies. The FIA has full access to the engine software and telemetry. They can monitor torque demand, ignition timing, fuel flow, ERS deployment and other parameters in real time. This prevents a manufacturer from secretly giving its works team a more aggressive engine map.

Engine mode restrictions also play a role. Since the 2020 season the FIA requires a single internal combustion engine mode to be used from qualifying through the race.

In practice this means the physical engine and its allowed operating modes must be the same across all teams using that manufacturer.

It used to be the case that customer engines weren’t as good but that all changed in 2018 with technical directive TD/005-18 but it goes on for ages so I’ll let you google it if you’re interested.



Works teams can still gain an advantage through better cooling, packaging or integration of the power unit within their chassis. However, the regulations are designed so that the actual power unit specification and performance must be identical between works and customer teams.
https://www.skysports.com/f1/news/1...on-being-provided-by-engine-supplier-mercedes

McClaren and Williams not happy.

And then there is this:
https://www.marca.com/motor/formula...-use-nuevo-aduo-salvo-aston-martin-honda.html

If you can't translate it then I'll break it down.

Mercedes won't let anyone use the new ADUO except Aston Martin-Honda​

The opinion in the paddock is that they will regulate to win by the minimum so that the competition does not apply the AI support program
In just five days the cars will be rolling in Shanghai for the second round of the 2026 season and for the first with Sprint, a challenge that is like climbing Everest for some like Aston Martin, but that will be a test to see if Mercedes continues with the same dominance in a completely different circuit.

In China there are much longer charging areas and where the delivery of its electric power will be much easier than in Australia and you will need to lift your foot from the accelerator less before each braking than in Melbourne.

If in 2025 the gasoline flow was measured with amount of flow that could not exceed 100 kg / h, in 2026 the measurement takes into account energy that that gasoline generates, being an ecofuel that can arrive from different sources and always without any fossil raw material.

Enrico Gualtieri, Ferrari’s head of engines, explained it. "There is a sensor that measures the energy flow, and before going out to the track each manufacturer will have to measure their fuel by a third body, which will have to declare how much the energy content is per unit mass of its gasoline, and then assign a value, which will be different for each supplier," he explained.

The Mercedes is Petronas for all its engines, its own partner in the equipment and its fuel is synthetic, while Shell (Ferrari) comes from biomass. They can control what they have and what their engines spend and McLaren, Williams and Alpine, which must be the same, but the Mercedes chassis is much lighter and more efficient and takes more performance out of it, at least at this start.

What all this mean?
Because Mercedes can control that fuel flow on each circuit and what’s best for its W17, as it progresses over the weekend. Until Friday’s FP3 they didn’t even appear in Australia and in qualifying they put 0.8 (from Russell to Leclerc) to Ferrari.
In the race they pressed when it was their turn at the beginning, to hunt down Leclerc after his stratospheric start and then, when Ferrari failed in the strategy (or simply wanted to continue with his plan because they knew that they could not go for the victory), both Russell and Antonelli could reach lap 58 with very used hard tyres, without suffering anything. That shows that the advantage they treasure is much greater than it seems. Their compression ratio of 18:1 (for the 16:1 of the rest) also gives them a lower consumption of gasoline. It is a chain that adds advantages and efficiency, rather than pure power. At the lowest weight, less tire degradation and addition and follow.

What is the ADUO?

The FIA explains that it is this word in its regulation 2026. “It’s the ADUO concept (translated is Additional Development and Improvement Opportunities), which aims to provide greater development opportunities to power unit manufacturers that are significantly below the competition in terms of performance. Performance will be continuously measured between all power units, and after races 6, 12 and 18, ADUO could be assigned to address this situation, providing."

If someone is between 2% and 4% below the performance of the best, in this case Mercedes, could introduce an improvement from race 7, the Canadian GP, if the difference is above the 4% disadvantage, it will be able to apply two improvements.

And that’s what Mercedes is going to try, that their rivals, except Aston Martin and Honda, who are in another film, can’t apply engine upgrades and win by the minimum while they can, less than that 2% if they can.
 
Well done George. Looking untouchable so far. Not out a foot wrong. Be great to have another new Brit winning it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top