goalmole
Well-Known Member
That'll be their tactic in the CL final.I can't recall a cup final with the ball more in the air than on the ground. Hoofball.
That'll be their tactic in the CL final.I can't recall a cup final with the ball more in the air than on the ground. Hoofball.
If he was in his own penalty area, it’s not a penalty, so how can it be handball in the middle of the pitch?
their owners make more investments into those who make decisions and media noise, so naturally no-one questions their antics.Delighted for Leicester. This was the one they really wanted.
However there is a massive double standard when it comes to the reporting of their brilliant owners and our own. We've rightly just heard on the BBC how the owners have bought into the local area and built up the club. Nevertheless, they broke FFP rules to get into the Premier League. I think the rules are rubbish but if it was us then the media would be all over us like a rash.
Well done and congratulations LCFC.
Thanks, both you. I'm already pissed and the night#s just getting started.Thanks mate, enjoy your night. Proper club with proper fans.
Is there not a law that if it hits a players arm whether accidental or not in the move that leads to a goal the goal can’t stand?
think Laporte/Jesus against Spurs two years ago
Or more recently Callum Wilson at Anfield a few weeks ago
The ball hits Perez’s hand before he sets up Tielemans
Why is nothing being made of this?
I know it’s a daft rule and it’s good to see Chelsea beaten, but come on rules are rules
Evidence?
I don’t even think it’s about whether there’s an advantageI've been saying the same thing on here and got battered ? the advantage he gained when the ball hitting his arm is clear