M
M
mat
Guest
Moss picked this game as the buffet cars at the Severn Valley Railway are stored in the sidings behind the main stand.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FA Cup Games 4/5/6 Feb '22
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
M
M
mat
Guest
Full of seamen.Come on plymouth ! Adore that place
kaz7
Well-Known Member
So was i lolFull of seamen.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,451
Could be worse, we might get Wigan.& playing boro still worries me.
:-/
M
M
mat
Guest
From a distance the Wham kit looks like an old city umbro one.
RadcliffeRick
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 9,021
- Location
- Kuala Lumpur Via Radcliffe
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 2008 Chelsea before that :-)
I see Plymouth are sponsored by the profits from Luke Shaws pastime
Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
Didn’t see the Boro goal, but what I read was that it bounced off his body onto his hand. If that is so, there is no conceivable intention, and it is a perfectly good goal. You cannot intend to handle the ball if it’s been deflected on to it in a split second. Nobody born has those reflexes. Just as, negatively, Micah’s penalty against Liverpool in the league cup was not conceivably a penalty.
The mere fact of the ball touching your arm or hand means nothing. To me, you have to judge intention, I’m afraid. I think we’ve come back to good sense, personally. Of course, if the ball has not bounced off a part of your body, but hit your hand directly, that can be a tricky judgement for the referee. I’m aware of that. And there’ll always be disagreements between fans and ref.
Anyway, one thing is beyond interpretation and ambiguity — we’re all having a fucking good laugh today.
The mere fact of the ball touching your arm or hand means nothing. To me, you have to judge intention, I’m afraid. I think we’ve come back to good sense, personally. Of course, if the ball has not bounced off a part of your body, but hit your hand directly, that can be a tricky judgement for the referee. I’m aware of that. And there’ll always be disagreements between fans and ref.
Anyway, one thing is beyond interpretation and ambiguity — we’re all having a fucking good laugh today.
Out on blue 6
Well-Known Member
Bargeing people out of the way to get to the front of the queue.Does anyone know where Luke Shaw was at full time?
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Makes the eric handball v spurs such bollocksDidn’t see the Boro goal, but what I read was that it bounced off his body onto his hand. if that is so, there is no conceivable intention, and it is a perfectly good goal. You cannot intend to handle the ball if it’s been deflected on to it in a split second. Nobody born has those reflexes. Just as, negatively, Micah’s penalty against Liverpool in the league cup was not conceivably a penalty.
The mere fact of the ball touching your arm or hand means nothing. To me, you have to judge intention, I’m afraid. I think we’ve come back to good sense, personally. Of course, if the ball has not bounced off a part of your body, but hit your hand directly, that can be a tricky judgement for the referee. I’m aware of that. And there’ll always be disagreements between fans and ref.