Fabian Delph

Status
Not open for further replies.
aguero93:20 said:
@Calv_from_the_frog I always thought Micah wanted to be Ronnie Coleman.
Click to expand...

Just had to look that one up, but yeah, looked far too muscular to be mobile in a right-back slot.

I can't think of another right-back of the same physique.

That said I watched his departing piece on the OS yesterday, and the guy is City through and through, and should - like Milner (and Dzeko if he leaves) - receive a standing ovation for his contribution should he ever line-up against us.

Not that there's any danger - 'cos we're better than that - but I'd be dissapointed if we went all 'Liverpool' on him (even if he scored against us).
 
Calv_from_the_frog said:
Just had to look that one up, but yeah, looked far too muscular to be mobile in a right-back slot.

I can't think of another right-back of the same physique.

That said I watched his departing piece on the OS yesterday, and the guy is City through and through, and should - like Milner (and Dzeko if he leaves) - receive a standing ovation for his contribution should he ever line-up against us.

Not that there's any danger - 'cos we're better than that - but I'd be dissapointed if we went all 'Liverpool' on him (even if he scored against us).
Click to expand...


Sorry, just thought of George Elokobi (ex-Wolves) he was a full-back, no ?
 
tonea2003 said:
you already know, dont you? seeing as you knew when pogba was signing!
Click to expand...
The thing about actually knowing something is you need to have good reasons for believing something is true and it also needs to be true. The first condition can be met in good faith while the second is unproved. When something turns out false we simply need to examine why we thought our reasons were good. Knowledge is founded on our honest mistakes.
 
George Hannah said:
The thing about actually knowing something is you need to have good reasons for believing something is true and it also needs to be true. The first condition can be met in good faith while the second is unproved. When something turns out false we simply need to examine why we thought our reasons were good. Knowledge is founded on our honest mistakes.
Click to expand...

jesus george its way too early for me to make sense of that jeeeez
 
George Hannah said:
The thing about actually knowing something is you need to have good reasons for believing something is true and it also needs to be true. The first condition can be met in good faith while the second is unproved. When something turns out false we simply need to examine why we thought our reasons were good. Knowledge is founded on our honest mistakes.
Click to expand...

that sounds like something you say in "off topic"
 
George Hannah said:
The thing about actually knowing something is you need to have good reasons for believing something is true and it also needs to be true. The first condition can be met in good faith while the second is unproved. When something turns out false we simply need to examine why we thought our reasons were good. Knowledge is founded on our honest mistakes.
Click to expand...
Proper journalists talk right there.
 
cityman14364 said:
jesus george its way too early for me to make sense of that jeeeez
Click to expand...

I think, and I don't know, that it's a bit like maths GCSE's (if they still exist, I'm 40).

You can still get credit for your working out, even if the final answer proves to be wrong.

But if you just provide an wrong answer without showing your working out, then if the person marking just thinks that you're a idiot, you've pretty much brought it upon yourself.
 
Calv_from_the_frog said:
I think, and I don't know, that it's a bit like maths GCSE's (if they still exist, I'm 40).

You can still get credit for your working out, even if the final answer proves to be wrong.

But if you just provide an wrong answer without showing your working out, then if the person marking just thinks that you're a idiot, you've pretty much brought it upon yourself.
Click to expand...
that bit of 'working out' certainly gets low marks from me
 
Are we gunna sign fabulous Fabian or not? I don't think he'd be more than a competitor with Fernando as the back up for the CM spot occupied by Fernandinho. But it's the middle of July, we've only signed the 18 year old, I'm sick of hearing about Sterling, Rory's foot, baseball, and Wimbledon. I would be excited if we brought back Santa Cruz at this point.

On a side note, I was joking about Santa Cruz but I heard he played well at the Copa for Paraguay.
 
Yea I saw the match he got injured.

True story- A friend of mine (he's an American with Paraguayan blood) became a City fan because of Santa Cruz.
 
That sky blue is much more attractive recently to the neutrals who are looking to find a team to support. for whatever reason ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top