Lunatic. That has nothing to do with anything.pauldominic said:Mikecini said:pauldominic said:I've discussed local issues with MES and we have established a consensus.
The last post was firmly aimed in my direction as well.
Answer my Question:
Who is responsible for the planning process in Manchester?
Manchester City Council or FCUoM?
Most of your post is nonsense.
Apologies for the nonsense.....the edited version. Not really that difficult to Join the dots but there you go.
In fact your response is an abridged version of your entire argument. Basically you are for the 'development' because you have friends, as it happens, from a ''committed christian family'', who support it and for no other reason. This 'reason' is enough in your eyes to decry all other argument regardless.
My second response but last words on this subject, you keep banging your head.
hahaha - raggy boy.
Roberto and his committed christian friends and players will take note.
Mad Eyed Screamer said:underthemoonlight said:Lovely reading. Keep going boys
As are all the details on your site about the two board members resigning! ;)
Seems like a nice bit of bullying has been going on!
SWP's back said:Lunatic. That has nothing to do with anything.pauldominic said:Mikecini said:Apologies for the nonsense.....the edited version. Not really that difficult to Join the dots but there you go.
In fact your response is an abridged version of your entire argument. Basically you are for the 'development' because you have friends, as it happens, from a ''committed christian family'', who support it and for no other reason. This 'reason' is enough in your eyes to decry all other argument regardless.
My second response but last words on this subject, you keep banging your head.
hahaha - raggy boy.
Roberto and his committed christian friends and players will take note.
lloydie said:pauldominic said:lloydie said:Would you doubt our very own "City friendly" rag?
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/non_league/s/227180_fc_united_two_steps_from_the_league_in_three_years" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... hree_years</a>
And yes you can edit Wiki but you can't edit Stuart Brennan.
Now answer the questions I posed to you before you took a tangent out of your magic bag to ask your questions or.... you're a troll Paul.
Nonsense.
I've supported City since April 1970 and you still refuse to answer 2 simple questions.
YOU are the troll here.
I answered all your questions, I called SB a City friendly rag, you loon, not you.
Q1
answer; Source= Stuart Brennan MEN
Q2
answer; Yes you can edit wikipedia. But not Stuart Brennan in the MEN.
Strewth, again, where does your mate who supports FCUM live? And is he aware of the aspiration made at a FCUM AGM that did not stipulate Newton Heath?
pauldominic said:lloydie said:pauldominic said:Nonsense.
I've supported City since April 1970 and you still refuse to answer 2 simple questions.
YOU are the troll here.
I answered all your questions, I called SB a City friendly rag, you loon, not you.
Q1
answer; Source= Stuart Brennan MEN
Q2
answer; Yes you can edit wikipedia. But not Stuart Brennan in the MEN.
Strewth, again, where does your mate who supports FCUM live? And is he aware of the aspiration made at a FCUM AGM that did not stipulate Newton Heath?
Hmmm....
Interesting.
I'll find out their version of events, although I can't believe that the original motivation has disappeared.
Also does Stuart Brennan really think City are concerned about FCUoM?
If you go looking for the lowest common denominator, its a planning dispute, but my interest has been well and truly sparked.
pauldominic said:lloydie said:pauldominic said:Nonsense.
I've supported City since April 1970 and you still refuse to answer 2 simple questions.
YOU are the troll here.
I answered all your questions, I called SB a City friendly rag, you loon, not you.
Q1
answer; Source= Stuart Brennan MEN
Q2
answer; Yes you can edit wikipedia. But not Stuart Brennan in the MEN.
Strewth, again, where does your mate who supports FCUM live? And is he aware of the aspiration made at a FCUM AGM that did not stipulate Newton Heath?
Hmmm....
Interesting.
I'll find out their version of events, although I can't believe that the original motivation has disappeared.
Also does Stuart Brennan really think City are concerned about FCUoM?
If you go looking for the lowest common denominator, its a planning dispute, but my interest has been well and truly sparked.
bakerdave76 said:http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1593944_fc-united-and-manchester-college-team-up-on-and-off-the-pitch
.Ahh.... FC United and Manchester College...... the principal at the time of the Moston stadium plans being announced just happened to be married to one of Moston's three councillors. Not surprisingly, she was in favour of the plans..... yet never once declared her conflict of interest until forced to at the planning meeting itself